International Driving Permits (IDP) are a special license that allows travelers to drive in foreign countries without having to take a written or driving test required to obtain a driver’s license in that country. In most countries, it is illegal to drive without a valid license and insurance. For example, if you have a valid US driver’s license or a valid license written in English, you do not need an IDP in Ireland, the United Kingdom, South Africa, Canada, or other countries.
For those planning a trip to Europe for leisure or business and plan on driving while there, an IDP is recommended. An IDP allows you to drive a vehicle in another country as long as you also have a valid driver’s license issued by your state. It is recognized as a proper form of identification.
When traveling internationally, it is essential to always carry your own, valid driver’s license and adhere to all traffic rules and speed limits when traveling. If you plan on losing your passport, it can be useful as a government document with your photo as ID. You can get an IDP issued with your temporary or interim driver’s license while you are traveling.
Not all countries accept a U.S. driver’s license, but most accept an IDP. If you are not renting a car, you would need an IDP as well. However, drivers licenses can be handy, especially if you are in Great Britain or Northern Ireland. Foreigners in the country must have an international driving license if their stay is longer than six months. In other cases, tourists can drive without an IDP.
📹 Driving or Traveling? Is it against the law to require a Driver’s License?
I’ve been a police officer for just over 10 years and worked 3rd shift until just a few months ago. I created the Columbus PoliceĀ …
Do I need an international driver’s license in Germany?
It is a legal requirement for licensed American drivers to possess an International Driving Permit (IDP) when renting a vehicle in Germany and driving it outside of the country in neighbouring Austria.
What documents do I need to drive in Italy?
Driving in Italy requires a valid driver’s license, V5C, proof of insurance, green card, passport/national ID, reflective jackets, warning triangles, and headlamp beam deflectors. UK drivers may be unprepared for the different driving culture, which can appear dangerous and aggressive. Italians often engage in aggressive driving, such as sitting on the bumper and flashing headlamps. EU figures suggest that Italy has almost double the number of road deaths per million inhabitants compared to the UK.
However, passenger car fatality figures in France, Belgium, Luxembourg, and many former Eastern European states are worse than Italy’s. Italians shrug off manoeuvres that might spark outrage among UK drivers, so it’s never worth taking things personally. It’s advised to resist adopting a “when in Rome” approach to driving standards until you’ve developed sharp instincts.
Do I need an international driver’s license in Italy in 2024?
Driving in Italy with a US license is possible for up to 12 months, but an International Driving Permit (IDP) is recommended for future use. Most rental companies accept valid US licenses, but an IDP can facilitate communication. Car rental agencies may require an IDP for specific requirements. Italy drives on the right side of the road, unlike most European countries. If you’re used to driving on the left side, driving in Italy as an American should not be significantly different in terms of direction and peripherals. It’s advisable to check with your chosen car rental agency for specific requirements.
Do we need an international driving licence in Italy?
It is recommended that American tourists visiting Italy obtain an International Driving Permit prior to departure from the United States. In the event that the permit expires, it is possible to apply for a new one via mail or through the American Automobile Association’s Worldwide Travel Department.
Do I need an international driving permit in the States?
An International Driving Permit (IDP) is required in every U. S. state, and it is necessary to obtain one before your trip. The process depends on the issuing country and the fees and time required. If you are a permanent resident in the U. S., you may be eligible to apply for a driver’s license from the state where you live. The residency requirements for obtaining a U. S. driver’s license vary by state, so it is essential to contact the state department of motor vehicles to check ID requirements and apply for a license. A state driver’s license allows you to drive anywhere in the U. S., but foreign visitors are not issued IDPs.
Do you need an international driving licence for France?
In France, drivers aged 18 or older are required to possess a valid driving license. Similarly, riders of mopeds or motorcycles with an engine capacity of up to 125cc must be at least 16 years of age. It should be noted that driving licenses from the UK, EU, and EEA countries are accepted, but international permits are not required.
Do I need an international license to rent a car in Germany?
Drivers must present a valid non-expired license at the rental location, including a Non-Latin-Letter Alphabet license and a valid International Drivers Permit. Overseas renters require a passport and a driving license, issued by authorized authorities at least 12 months before the rental start date. Locations may request additional ID or conduct further checks, including external partners checking supplied details against databases. Driver’s license requirements in the US and Canada are also applicable.
Can foreigners drive in the US without a license?
The United States lacks public transit and most people use cars, except in major cities like New York, Chicago, and San Francisco. A valid driver’s license is required to drive in the US, and a foreign driver’s license can work in some cases. However, for long-term relocations, an International Driving Permit (IDP) is likely necessary. To use a foreign driver’s license in the US, two criteria must be met: the license is originally in English or has an official translation, and the driver won’t be driving in the US for more than three months.
Can a B1 B2 visa get a US driver’s license?
In certain states, such as Texas, tourists are permitted to apply for temporary driver’s licenses, which they may obtain by taking a driving test and receiving a valid license for their stay. It should be noted, however, that non-US citizens on visitor visas are not eligible in the District of Columbia. To ascertain the necessary requirements for applying, tourists are advised to consult the relevant state-specific guidelines. In the event that a state does permit tourists to apply, they will be required to present proof of identity, such as a passport with a date of departure and the expiration date of the license.
What documents do I need to drive in France?
When driving in France, you need a minimum legal driving age of 18, a national driving license, an original registration document (V5), motor vehicle insurance, front and rear seatbelts, and a national driving license. France offers stunning scenery and freedom to explore by car, campervan, motorbike, or any vehicle of choice. However, if you’re new to mainland Europe, it’s essential to know the vehicle rules, have insurance, and carry the essentials. Driving in France allows you to choose your route and take detours as needed.
Which country is the easiest to get a driver’s license in Europe?
Latvia is a popular destination for obtaining a driver’s license within the European Union due to its easy-to-take English test, low costs, and no minimum number of hours for practical driving lessons or medical examination. Other countries like Estonia and France also offer similar options. Driving licenses within the EU are valid indefinitely without an international driving license, but it is advisable to apply for one if you plan to move around the world, as not all countries accept national licenses.
The international driving license serves as a translation of the national license and indicates that the driver had a valid license at the time of application. However, applying for an international license usually requires permanent residence in the country, which may not be worth the effort for permanent tourists.
📹 How To Get An International Driver’s License in 15 minutes (United States)
Get your #InternationalDrivingPermit (IDP) at a AAA Branch before your #travel date. You will need this to #DriveAbroad legally.
I paid for my car I paid for my driver’s license I pay to renew my driver’s license I paid the sales tax I pay the excise tax I pay for the gasoline I pay for the “gas guzzler” tax I pay for the maintenance and repair of my car I pay for my car insurance I pay for the yearly inspection of my car I pay for the gasoline tax I pay for the registration of my car I pay for the renewal of my registration I pay the tolls for driving on the highways Soon enough I will be forced to pay for a carbon tax because I don’t want an Electric Vehicle WOW what a HUGE “privilege” I have to drive my vehicle! Thank you, government, for letting me pay my way to move about freely! I am soooo privileged!
The term “may” can take on different meanings in documents like Black’s Law. It suggests that an obligation remains in effect until a minor becomes competent enough to assert their rights independently. The use of “may” indicates a permissive choice, granting discretion. In contrast, “shall” is commonly used to establish a mandatory requirement. It’s essential for individuals to study and comprehend these laws, recognizing that the words in legal documents can be potent tools wielded by those in power. Every word is meticulously chosen and may pose challenges to the average reader who may not fully grasp the intricacies of language and legal writing.
UCC 1 ā 308 the law of contracting. Offer and acceptance is the highest form of law. You have to agree to the terms with full disclosure of contracts for any agreement to be ironclad. When you register a vehicle, the word indicates that you’re giving over ownership to another . Household goods also called your personal automobile, has nothing to do with corporations in commerce, therefore does not need registration . There’s some basics hear a lot of people do not understand about public and private
“The supreme court has warned, ‘Because of what appears to be Lawful commands{ statutory rules, regulations and codes-ordinances and restrictions} on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance…{deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion, and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts}”. -United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 178,76, S.Ct. 281, L.Ed. 185
In all due respect officer, question, is a license required to obey traffic rules, or can any traveler in his private automobile an do the same. You are mixing apples with oranges. The first paragraph covers the people’s right in their private constitutional capacity. That is in fact the subject matter of the first paragraph. The second is expressing the rules of the road only for safety purposes, that only requires common sense. The first is stating a constitutional fact and the second is just stating there are rules of the road. That my friend is mixing apples and oranges and calling them the same thing.
I do want to know how can they prove that by registering or having a license makes the road safer how many accidents happen daily with vehicles that have had safety inspections and registered still have accidents so if they say it’s for safety should they be liable for anything that could happen to me using public roads that is not my fault driving lessons should be required class in school and just let the people have insurance and that’s it license and registration will never stop wrecks or deaths for happening
Michigan MCL 257.7a, states: ” A commercial motor vehicle does not include a vehicle used exclusively to transport personal possessions or family members for nonbusiness purposes. The intent of 257. el is expressed in its enabling clause, in part; to wit: “AN ACT to provide for the registration, titling, sale, transfer, and regulation of certain vehicles operated upon the public highways of this state or any other place open to the general public or generally accessible to motor motor vehicles”. There two classifications, open to the public (or is a conjunction connecting to phrases) that are “open to the general public” and “certain motor vehicles”. As I said apples are not oranges, It is the same with “the general public” and “certain motor vehicles”.
“No statute passage on the highways give, government entity the power to allow or deny, byways, nor waterways… transporting his automobile and private property for either recreation or business,….. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, automobile registration, or forced insurances.” Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22. / People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210.
It sounds more like the people may operate vehicles without restriction (having to go through a legal process and pay money is a restriction) until such people pose a threat to the safety of the public. If you try to make it mean the way you stated, the first half and second half would contradict each other. Thus, even with the full context it still states a pre-issued permit would be infringing on someones rights until they have done something to infringe on another persons rights.
I dare anyone to look up their state vehicle/transportation laws for the definition of “street or highway” and then you’ll begin to understand how legalese is deceptive. Words mean whatever they want.. Edit: its blatantly overwhelmingly obvious the algorithm highlight the response supporting a specific idea.
Maybe more research is needed. You can do some cross reference with the cases you looked up. Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781 “Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty.” People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210. “No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterwaysā¦ transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances.
Of course, being a patrol officer, a.k.a., revenue generator, for a decade you’re going to have a highly biased view on the subject! Do you really believe a supposedly free American needs to ask another supposedly free assumed American for permission to utilize his own mechanical locomotion device on publicly funded roadways(which is a 100% totally LAWFUL activity!)? And to have to pay a yearly fee to do so? In addition to having to pay annual registration/tax fees on said mobility device? Of course you do! That’s how get paid! By being a road pyrant(pirate/tyrant)! BTW, if a city issued a driver’s license, wouldn’t it only be applicable within that city’s limits/boundaries? And what is Is the legal definition of “city”? Is it congruent with the terms “state”, “State”, “this State”, etc.? And any Supreme Court citations from the 1920’s concerning traffic laws are effectively inapplicable to modern day cases.
Well, one point to be considered given the logic/interpretation presented here, then, would be, 1) there would need to be a victim of some capacity, in order for there to be a violation of safety, and/or 2) if there were to be a victim(s) in a case involving properly licensed owner/operators/travelers… then that person could likely sue the issuing agency for damages beings that they issued a license (insuring public safety) to a person they could not guarantee wouldn’t cause harm to persons or property in the future… Thereby making the State negligent in it’s licensing procedures. Of course, non of this is truly the issue. The true issue is the American people have become weak and undeserving of their freedoms — So, the government takes them in the name of regulation. We are no longer accountable to the fact that our personal safety, as it were is an individual responsibility. You want to live in a safe country?… take accountability and enlist in the Armed Forces, become a police officer, firefighter etc. You want to be a free people?…. Take accountability! Be brave stand for your freedom! Stop this nonsense of resting on the efforts of what others have done (case law). Your freedoms were won on a battlefield by people willing to defend and die if need be for them…. They do not rest in the say-so of an authority figure, nor are they granted to you by any documentation. Blood, and blood alone, is what secures freedom!
USC title49 chapter 131 definition Motor carrier.āThe term “motor carrier” means a person providing motor vehicle transportation for compensation Motor vehicle.āThe term “motor vehicle” means a vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used on a highway in transportation, or a combination determined by the Secretary, but does not include a vehicle, locomotive, or car operated only on a rail, or a trolley bus operated by electric power from a fixed overhead wire, and providing local passenger transportation similar to street-railway service. So we know that a motor vehicle is about anything as long as you are providing a service or some type of compensation. What if a person doesn’t “drive” a “motor vehicle”?
The problem is that you need to buy a black law dictionary and start looking at the definitions of court and anything else you want?A definition of it will blow your mind, Our country is so corrupt that they will do anything to make you pay additional taxs, We have quadruple even more than thit’s not taxation without representation.. Did you know that you do not have to pay taxes, and there is a book out there that will prove that you do not have to pay taxes? Written by the Is internal revenue service. The book is called ( The Complete internal revenue service tax code ) cost $ 230.00 and is as big as a regular sheet of paper and 2 and half inches thick. This book will show you do not owe taxes.
Something that has come up in the past few years or so is the widespread adoption by multiple states is the classification of electric bikes in which the laws being passed attempt to restrict bicycles with electric motors that can barely go 20mph, in which they are attempting to force people to have a motorcycle license and registration of the vehicle if it goes over 20mph or just has a motor larger than 750 watts. However, that begs the question. What legal justification do they have for these laws when someone on a streamlined bicycle can go over 20mph downhill with just their own strength? But also why are velomobiles not being restricted when they can get up to 25 mph when on flat ground also just with the strength of a Human? With this said I wouldn’t be surprised if they did put more restrictions with the way things are going, but everyone must ask why these laws are being put in place. Is it public safety? No. Anyone can gain access to a vehicle if there is no one to stop them. Then what may I ask everyone is it really for?
Correction. If it is constitutionally allowed in one state. It must be allowed in others. That’s the point of every state haveing to adhere to the constitution. So just becuase it’s a Case in Virginia. It still stands in Colorado. Now the states can make different statues and codes and have different sub rules in commerce. But they can not choose to have a different perspective upon the constitution itself
Don’t care. Using property without permission is Trespassing, correct? Requiring a license to use public property imposes a duty or obligation of performance. If using the public roads without a license is not trespassing, but instead a quasi crime for failure to preform a duty, i.e. getting a license; What actual proof, witness etc.. can back up the claim that you have a duty or obligation to preform for the State? You are either trespassing or you are not, anything short of that would require some witness that can testify that you have some duty to preform, which is typically related to contracts. So what evidence do you rely on, that proves a duty or obligation of performance actually exists?
The right to travel is not even an argument. It is a right. No state can convert a right into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it. All departments of transportation receive their authority from the federal motor carrier safety administration. Transportation is strictly a commercial activity only defined by legal definition. I’ve never seen a statute define transportation. If you are not engaged in the commercially regulatable activity of transportation, how can they issue you a transportation violation? Common sense. Blacks law dictionary. Look up transportation and look up carrier. Super simple, guys.
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals is located in Richmond, Virginia. As stated above, this circuit court includes the Eastern and Western Districts of Virginia, and it also includes the District of Maryland, the Eastern District of North Carolina, the Middle District of North Carolina, the Western District of North Carolina, the District of South Carolina, the Northern District of West Virginia, and the Southern District of West Virginia
It appears that you may be wrong…what that said is the drivers license is being revoked because of “safety” issue…if he had insurance for liability under the safety there would not be an issue..and only in the capacity of commerce where the federal granted money to the state to regulate comnerce clause that a license is needed..there is no other clause for any other government to add or remove that law..which means license for any state to enforce the law is only under commerce clause ..and states recieve federal grant and must abide by that law…and as far as revoking a drivers license that you may do because that person truly is not under commerce to even need a license in the first place and sure it could be revoked by the state because it may belong only to them…but just because you revoked the license doesn’t he had no rights on the road..he paid the tax at the pump he paid the tax through invisible tax…if the roads were just strictly for commerce then why do we have the option to register the vehicle or why do dmv need to have our consent and signature… shouldn’t we each of us just be automatically be known to the state that any of us are allowed to drive and assume to have a license and not have to even apply for a drivers license because every person is assumed to be in the capacity of doing commerce? Or is it something you that the state or dmv have not fully disclose to each person that their property they register is bo longer their own and placed in a state trust.
When ypu get a drivers license you sign a contract … If you never got a driver’s licence you can travel freely on the road ..aslong its not to go to work and back .. Thats why the insurance always ask you is it for work and back … Also. If yout drivers licence was expired the agreement of the contract is broken .. Police officers just don’t know the laws ..alot of them accually.. But,slowly people are lerning from this and if they get stop then they are let go to freely travel on the road with their property.
as for everyone else… stop trying to make things so complicated. its all very simple: if you break a law = you commit a crime, you go to criminal court and either prove your innocence or get sentenced to jail.. EVEN PROBABTION IS A JAIL SENTENCE – its just a suspended one. but if you break legislation you do not go to criminal court – you go to an administrative court ( MADE TO ACT LIKE A COURT OF LAW) where your ignorance will always cost you- UNLESS YOU CHOOSE TO COMPREHEND RATHER THAN UNDERSTAND. WHAT IS THE LEGAL DEFINITION OF A ‘PERSON’? it is a corporation or entity that cannot take responsibility for itself…. do not take my word for it.. GO SEE FOR YOURSELF. a law that is not defined is no law at all. a contract is only valid if those who entered it did so with informed consent and of their own free will. legislation is NOT LAW . now i want to make it clear that legislation (otherwise defined as the rules WITHIN society that are subject to the LAWS OF THAT SOCIETY ) are of no force or effect should those rules (legislation) violate the LAWS (constitution-codexes).. BUT IF YOU DO NOT CONFRONT THE RULES FOR BEING CRIMINALLY CONSTRUCTED WHEN THEY ARE – then you are not taking the responsibility in a peaceful or reasonable manner to govern yourself accordingly and therefore an argument can be made that you require a government – for the purpose of peace. some of the people in this country who you would expect to know all these things actually DO NOT. FOR PETES SAKE EVEN CONRAD BLACK GOT THINGS WRONG WHEN HE PARROTTED THE WORDS OF THE ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA which claims there were SAVAGE NATIVE INDIANS WHEN THEY GOT HERE .
Does anyone here really drive without a license? I do ā🏾 ive haven’t had a license in about 20,yrs in Nevada when they do get behind me they seem to not care only in my later years though i know its at there discretion but they typically just pull up next to me and say hi 🤠🖐🏾i do hope it stays that way.
To those who dont know its an actual constitutional ruling by the US supreme court that if you are not engaged in commerce you are not required to have a liscense or registration on property to exercise said fundamental right it also says that the government may not force citizens to pay fees, fines, or liscenses to exercise a fundamental right we do not liscense something that is considered a fundamental right. Now mind you there’s people in valor they know you don’t know this shit and they try to change the way they operate, knowing you’re not gonna catch them on it. A Smart citizen is a self educated citizen. Learn your rights and what they actually mean. To protect yourself from greedy leaders and corrupt officials looking to line their pockets under the guise that its for the greater good.
Please explain before I had a driver’s license I was pulled over more than 15 times 10 Vehicles were taken away I had 4 outstanding bench warrants for my arrest accumulated and not once ever arrested so is it because I never had a driver’s license that I never signed up for 🤷🏽āāļø stolen property I believe
Its not about the wheels. Its about the roads/ bridges. You have the right to offroad, drive as a kid, drive without license, and to some extent even drive recklessly etc.. on your OWN property or well off the grid/ off the beaten path. But nah, i would disagree you have a right to drive on ROADS without abiding by whatever rules the state says.. they can be arbitrary even.. to be honest a cop can pull you over on a public road for any reason.. most won’t. But only slightly novel complication nowadays is “commute” is where it gets complicated.. not too novel, but now getting more mainstream as more people get cars especially multiple cars per family. People will claim right to a “commute” to survive and work in the industrialized new modern world. Claiming that if the state owns and can rule arbitrarily the roads, your infringing on their right to work.. cuz new saying is “before you can go to work, you need to be able to get there”.. especially w people navigating out of cities more.. so if cop pulls you over arbitrarily for idk really whatever ( in theory they can say ohh you were over speed limit by 1 mph.. they can really say anything..once again i know most cops won’t be like that but.. i mean sometimes they do have to be arbitrary like a car fits a description even w a different plate..like they have to be able to pull people over unfortunately) But a potential argument could be: “well in industrialized world.. the ONLY or BASICALLY ONLY way to work (right to work) because its the new majority way to work is to live a Driving distance away from said workplace and use public industrialized taxpayer funded roads that were originally agreed by “the people” intended for so that they the people can “Commute” to work in the industrialized world.
The police officer hates true meanings and definitions of words under law law enforcement love to throw words around without knowing the actual legal definitions and meanings of said words. Recommend getting a copy of the Black Law’s dictionary that way you can know the proper meaning legally of the words you use on the public
Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 U.S. 105 No State can convert a secured liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it, SHUTTLESWORTH VS BIRMINGHAM ALABAMA 399 U.S. 147 If the state dose convert a secured liberty into a privilege, you can ignore the license and and continue with the right with impunity
Here we see another police officer who knows nothing about the motor vehicle laws. Shocking. (Well, maybe not all that shocking.) Attorneys who know nothing about the motor vehicle laws? Now THAT is shocking. (Well, maybe not terribly shocking.) Judges who know nothing about the motor vehicle laws? Shocking. (No, not this one, either.) The director of the division of motor vehicles who has no idea what the motor vehicle laws are? (Well…) And that’s why everybody needs a license.
THE “RIGHT TO TRAVEL” in the conveyance of one’s choosing over the Public Roads (as a “matter of right”) is an inalienable right and not up for discussion or debate (also backed up by the 1st & 14th Amendment). “We The People” own the roads in this Master-Servant relationship and WE have designated the “government” to manage them for us. The “government” exists and serves “at our will and our will only”. The “Police Powers” are to regulate Commercial Activity (a Constitutional delegation and limitation) and crimes against others utilizing a “vehicle”. LEARN THE RULES OF STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION AND LEARN to interpret case law correctly within the CONTEXT of the Constitution. THE SUPREME COURT WILL give the correct answer to the WRONG QUESTION. AS FOR STATUTES AND CODES, they are for the management of government and Public Servants DO NOT dictate, the “Master” does. THE “MOTOR VEHICLE CODE”, like every other is to be “STRICTLY CONSTRUED”. AND ever hear of Ejusdem generis? Look it up.
Darn as a police officer did you forget “city” has a very specific meaning and doesn’t extend past the city limits to say county roads, state roads or interstate highways. Some U.S. highways pass through the city but you understand what the court said now. Then your disclaimer that a court ruling in Virginia doesn’t apply to other jurisdictions because a “lawyer” told you so. Certainly you or that lawyer isn’t suggesting that the rest of the country doesn’t enjoy the same constitutional protections that one is afforded in Virginia are you? You have been out there ticketing people and taking their money while violating their rights. You got played. Someone told you some lies to get you to do their dirty work and you believed them. You don’t want to be the bad guy so you searched out the case law the “q anon” nut referenced and overlooked one word. I don’t know or care because I have a license insurance and registration. Unlike some I’m not out there violating my neighbors constitutional rights to get a few bucks for the county coffers. You found some case law that says he’s right with the possible exception of within city limits. Why not find some case law that says cops can regulate travel for private citizens. Remember the state can make no laws that interfere with a person’s constitutional rights. Virginia already reminded us of the rights you’re suggesting that police can violate. Many cops think might makes right until they’re outnumbered and out gunned but are you like that?
and further down in the paper i can read this…. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right in so doing to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day; and under the existing modes of travel includes the right to drive a horse-drawn carriage or wagon thereon, or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purposes of life and business. It is not a mere privilege, like the privilege of moving a house in the street, operating a business stand in the street, or transporting persons or property for hire along the street, which a city may permit or prohibit at will. The exercise of such a common right the city may, under its police power, regulate in the interest of the public safety and welfare; but it may not arbitrarily or unreasonably prohibit or restrict it, nor may it permit one to exercise it and refuse to permit another of like qualifications, under like conditions and circumstances, to exercise it. Taylor v. Smith, 140 Va. 217, 124 S. E. 259; Ex parte Dickey, 76 W. Va. 576, 85 S. E. 781, L. R. A. 1915-F, 840; Hadfield v. Lundin, 98 Wash. 657, 168 Pac. 516, L. R. A. 1918-B, 909, Ann. Cas. 1918-C, 942. (7, 8) The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets; but such permits may not be arbitrarily refused or revoked, or permitted to be held by some and refused to other of like qualifications, under like circumstances and conditions.
Being an American National works for me. I have no drivers license, ever. Thus no contracts at all. Got pulled over test driving a car i bought and fixed up with a new big bullet, 455ci, gave cop my passport. Since car was still non opted and titled with CA he towed it. All my bad. He handed me a ticket for speeding 80 in a 45, no license, no proof of insurance, no registration, and a misdemeanor for false plate, my bad I got ahead of myself and had my private plate on car. I signed it without prejudice then went walking. Court never put ticket on the docket, DA sent an offer to attend misdemeanor school ( $500 plus sware to obey all their codes and such. ) Returned that offer within 72 hrs. The whole matter evaporated. Zip. That’s a yr ago. Life is easier here in California as a state National. No registering my cars, no emission testing fees, no tax burdens, no registering for the draft, no code enforcement on my property, just freedom. No fear of corporate baloney. It starts by correcting the SS5 status and then passport status. Then ucc 1… FREE YOURSELF
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE Sec. 502.003. REGISTRATION BY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION PROHIBITED. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a political subdivision of this state may not require an owner of a motor vehicle to: register the vehicle; pay a motor vehicle registration fee; or pay an occupation tax or license fee in connection with a motor vehicle. (b) This section does not affect the authority of a municipality to: license and regulate the use of motor vehicles for compensation within the municipal limits; and impose a permit fee or street rental charge for the operation of each motor vehicle used to transport passengers for compensation, other than a motor vehicle operating under a registration certificate from the department or a permit from the federal Surface Transportation Board. (c) A fee or charge under Subsection (b) may not exceed two percent of the annual gross receipts from the vehicle. (d) This section does not impair the payment provisions of an agreement or franchise between a municipality and the owners or operators of motor vehicles used to transport passengers for compensation. MUNICIPAL CHARTER OF THE CITY OF AMARILLO ARTICLE 2 Section 22.āPeace and Good Order: To license any lawful business, occupation or calling that is susceptible to the control of the police power To license, tax and regulate or charges of fares made by any person, firm or corporation owning, operating or controlling any vehicle operated for the carriage of passengers or freight for hire, on the public streets of the city.
I believe all citizens DO have the rights to travel the country freely and at will and how they see fit, without a license, UNLESS you are being paid to drive, taxi, cops, truckers, etc. It should not be a privilege. But I’m not stupid enough to think I’m above the law and I will follow it. I’m just saying how I think it should be.
The dumb just oozes out of you. How does a commercial agent(police) enforce law, when youve never read law, you only read watered down codifications (paraphrase) of anothers opinion? How do you be a victim, judge, jury and executioner on the streets? Do you ever think? You never read the original law. Police powers is under regulation of commerce, travel is not commercial.
The ruling that people keep using was a case in the supreme court of Virginia in the early 1900s. It was NOT a ruling from the US Supreme court. Also the ruling was about a man who wasn’t allowed to drive because he was deemed unimpaired. People love to quote the 1st part of the ruling. But fail to read the following part – The right of a citizen to travel and transport property and to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day may, under the police power, be regulated by the city in the interest of public safety and welfare; but the city may not arbitrarily or unreasonably prohibit or restrict it, nor may it permit one to exercise it and refuse to permit another of like qualifications, under like conditions and circumstances, to exercise it. So yeah, EVERYONE needs a license. Thats how the states regulate safety.
There’s a few things everyone needs to know, one, this is a officer of the corporation, he only knows what he has been told to task! He does not know the law, and does not understand that, the state through the 9th and 10th amendments was only given authority to regulate Commerce(it’s, business) and Commercial activity, and in the regulation of it’s commerce, is where he seems to believe that, that applies to anyone attempting to use the highways or operate a automobile on the highways, which is far from the truth, Commerce ( it’s business) are those such as taxies, limo drivers, passenger vans, police cars, fire rescue, tow trucks, mail trucks, fed x ups, passenger buses, etc. commerce, those above mentioned are non commercial business operating in commerce, and are required to have special license and or permits to operate, Commercial activity, grayhound busses, double trailers, tankers, hazmat, heavy haulers, car carriers, are commercial activity, these are the two fields of activity the state all states was given authority to regulate, not personal private travel, laws of the road does not include a individual to have a license, laws of the road are the regulations that a state was given authority to implement,traffic lights, speed limits, weight requirements, stop signs, pedestrian crossing signs, crosswalk signs, mile markers, city limit signs, etc,. Each states statute, requiring an individual to possess a license in order to drive in the roads is a scam and a Constitutional violation of rights, the scam, it’s designed to steal money, the Constitutional violation, is, a violation of the due process, as a traffic ticket is not a judicial notice, or a summons, or indictment, no administrative court has ever been given authority to bring, try, and prosecute there own cases, that’s a violation of the separation of powers, only judiciary court has the authority to do this, Articles 3 section 2 clause 2, of the United States Constitution tells you this, no state can be a party to a case without first obtaining an indictment from a grand jury, period, and give notice, all three levels of the court system are held to this rule or they commit treason, and violate constitutional rights, if a driver’s license and registration was a lawful requirement, not legal, but lawful requirement, it fall within the scope of the Constitution and not violate rights protected by that constitution, traffic tickets are tools of extortion used by means of threat to steal your money!
There is a lot more to it than this case this was the pioneered case…the supreme Court also ruled that if the city or state does try to charge a license or fee you can ignore it and continue as you were! This is still the United States of America Republic! Those laws are for commerce and are contracts we do not have to concent to they have no jurisdiction to impose and force codes or statues on us they are not law!!!!
It may have been a court case in Virginia but it is a federal case and ruling so as far as the federal government goes it does not require unless engaging in commerce but state is able to but still its limited to commerce. I think everyone is misinterpreting OUR RIGHTS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED…..DONT LOOK AT THEM, THINK ABOUT THEM, TOUCH THEM, OR THINK ABOUT TOUCHING THEM. THEY ARE OUR PROPERTY!!!! What part of it is unconstitutional do you people not understand? Apparently people do not understand the difference between legal and lawful. Political officials, police officers, lawyers, etc all took an oath of office but have you ever really made sure that your oath of office on record is what it is supposed to be? Most of you guys are committing treason but are so indoctrinated you believe what you are doing is lawful because thats what you are taught!!! 😢 READ THE CONSTITUTION AND READ AND UNDERSTAND ALL YOUR RIGHTS IT WILL BE TO YOUR OWN DETRIMENT IF YOU FAIL TO DO SO
Why is that Lower case citizen ? See: Am juris Prudence that quides the Judges re: police powers = see: Art 10 = peace officer..also not same as people…there’s more…..there is a difference of people, and officers and differences in who is to be taxed which is revenue your public servants are out collecting when they owe those taxes …= a ton of other extenuating circumstances are intertwined even more to conclude what is going on in it’s totality….there is additionally policies = insurance policies and government vs an LLC…so complete the behind “all” scenes before concluding any One separate part of the Whole…. We tend to judge maaaany people an things of others with parts of a situation, that had faaaaaaaar more to it all !!!!!! It’s done eeeevery day by many….i have touched on just a tiny portion of many parts to it all……see all definitions of every policy, rules and regulations and DOT regulations, commercial, IRS and IRC……..person corporation, natural person, people and states, union ..geography, U.S. US “the” United and plain United States then these …then the Transportation Department and the Department Of Transpotation etc. While also reading what a policy IS, as well…there’s more….see also: Clearfield Doctrine while putting it aaaaaalllll together as well as ambiguous addintionall these Statutes at Large while considering all things and where fed authority is given on non insular or insular..and “waterways” also…add land movable or land as in “soil” etc.
backing up with law request….. where does LAW come from? most of you will contribute the ” to keep the peace yada yada, in a civilized yada’ line… but that is not an answer. There is ONE law that rules over all life no matter the size of the organism. you can look at it religiously, scientifically, practically and/or naturally and it will always be the same. it does not care how you feel and will not be dictated to, it only cares to exist and DOES . ” THAT WHICH CANNOT ADAPT AND EVOLVE WILL DIE” period. If you want to call it the law of nature, gods law, the laws of science makes no difference. everyone and everything that is alive must uphold this law or die. what does it take to uphold this law? the creation, protection maintenance and guard of an environment where adaptation can flourish and thrive . WELCOME TO THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FREEDOM. without our individual differences we have nothing to adapt to.. nothing to learn, taste touch or experience.. and therefore nothing to create ANEW… evolution happens when two separate somethings compromise some of themselves in partnership with another or others for the purpose of suvival and those who do not seek these purposeful characteristics .. DIE sooner than those who do… we are made to create… we are forced TO DESTROY….
You cannont make a right into a privilege and then charge you for said privilege. You also have to have a SS card to get a license. Which by law a SS # is an agreement with the state for benefits. You can give your SS card back and eliminate the agreement with the govt at any time you see fit. If you have insurance and no license and are driving you are not putting anyone at risk and you are still able to legally repair damage to someone’s property. Hence you don’t need a license just insurance. Bc then you are under your right of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and freely traveling
Ā¹Black’s Law Dictionary definition of license. Ā² Murdock vs Pennsylvania 319 U.S. 105 “No state may convert a secured liberty into a privilege, and issue a licence and a fee for it” A living man, living under common law, statutes have no jurisdiction over them if their status is correctly secured and represented. Policy Enforcement Officers over step their bounds tens of thousands of times daily. Often times to the disadvantage, and egregious violations of the rights of the people that they were born with on this soil.
I read so many cases is not even funny. This guy is a troll. He was hired to cause fear in my opinion. I bet he was a cop or still under contract with the state. I just beat a traffic ticket for no inspection and i didn’t even show up for court. If you know the law and you read the cases the cops if they are smart will leave you alone. Ive literally just filed a suit in federal district court on a conspiracy of deprivation of RightsĀ§ 241.
@Law Talk With Mike this is Murdock V. PENN 1. A municipal ordinance which, as construed and applied, requires religious colporteurs to pay a license tax as a condition to the pursuit of their activities, is invalid under the Federal Constitution as a denial of freedom of speech, press and religion. Pp.Ā 319 U. S. 108-110. 2. The mere fact that the religious literature is “sold”, rather than “donated” does not transform the activities of the colporteur into a commercial enterprise. P.Ā 319 U. S. 111. 3. Upon the record in these cases, it cannot be said that “Jehovah’s Witnesses” were engaged in a commercial, rather than in a religious, venture. P.Ā 319 U. S. 111. 4. A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution. P.Ā 319 U. S. 113. 5. The flat license tax here involved restrains in advance the Constitutional liberties of press and religion, and inevitably tends to suppress their exercise. P.Ā 319 U. S. 114.
sigh….this is awful, for starters your ability to read and recite text is subpar. making psychologically manipulative statements about the intelligence of some vaguely generalized group vs those within your content community is in poor moral character though forgivable i suppose as likely habitual from your career. the fact that the city may police the right in question speaks to situations wherein a person is abusing that right in such a way as to present clear danger to the welfare of their fellow persons. as far as the quoted case only applying to the state of virginia, no, it is the states ruling on the application of a constitutionally protected right,which is to say that the court has no jurisdiction to do anything except verify or deny whether such right applies to the case in question.
Ok… so how is you reading one Court case, that as you said, “is more about the suspension of a license” a conclusion.?. Are you not doing the same thing you were accusing others of doing? saying “people are not smart enough” that you hate these “court words” Proper research starts with Blacks Law 4th edition and The Declaration of Independence.. look up every word..In my humble opinion, everyone, especially those that take an oath should be required to do that very thing..
You’re correct about this specific case being in Virginiaā¦ BUT it’s a constitutional right to exercise your right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness which covers the right to travel without a license, registration or insurance. It’s a constitutional right to travel without a license as long as you’re not doing it to make money but strictly just for personal or pleasure reasons. The U.S. supreme courts have SEVERAL cases where they have defended this right all across the country. “Chicago motor coach Vs. Chicago 337 Illinois 200, 169 NE 22. “The court makes it clear that a license related to qualifications to engage in professional, business, trade or calling: thus, when merely traveling WITHOUT compensation or profit, outside or business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state NO LICENSE IS REQUIRED of the natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation. “No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways… transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation of business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is NOT A PRIVILEGE REQUIRING LICENSING, VEHICLE REGISTRATION, OR FORCED INSURANCES. But a mere fundamental constitutional RIGHT that must be protected by the courts.
Whoa there buddy, Can’t be equating Qanon and the sovereign chumps now. Some of the Q people are wild, but I know many who are just good people and some of the stuff is quite plausible from what I’ve seen. One additional credit is most back the blue wholeheartedly. Just had to throw that out there. Big fan of your other website by the way.
I would cite Murdock V Pennsylvania that if a right is converted to a privilege then the citizens have the right to ignore with Impunity (without punishment) also yes a driver’s license can be required but definition of a driver is that who is employed and acting in a commercial vehicle. So yes they can require a driver to have a license as its all commercial. Look into Nisi Prius courts😉ā🏽🙏🏽
Constitutional Guaranty = Common Right = Is not a mere Privilege which may be Permitted or Prohibited at will. (No Lie-cense Required) On the “Public owned” roads. Commerce = Commercial = For profit Income or Gain = Privilege = License Required on all roads. AGO 1959 No. 88 – Dec 10 1959 As stated in 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Ā§ 202, p. 987: “Personal liberty, or the right to the enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guaranty in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the federal Constitution, and which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable rights; as sacred as the right of private property; or as occupying a preferred position as contrasted with property rights; and is regarded as inalienable.” This concept is further amplified in 11 Am.Jur., Constitutional Law, Ā§ 329, p. 1135 wherein it is said: “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion -to go where and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
You do not understand what you are reading… It says it not a privilege… its a RIGHT.. but the state has the RIGHT with reasonable cause to insure publically safety… AKA, The right to regulate Commerce. What this means is he lost his license TO DO COMMERCE…. Because commerce is the moving of goods or people for HIRE… which you skipped that part of the setnence… left it out unpurpose… That’s called Biased Conjecture. The Chief said he was acting unsafe and DRIVING recklessly.. not TRAVELING…. but DRIVING (Engaged in Commerce or transporting other people for hire, unsafely…) so the Chief revoked his LICENSE… His LICENSE To Transport PEOPLE for HIRE (Compensation)…. They didnt revoke his RIGHT to TRAVEL on road ways in a Automobile… Just his license… The second part basically just says in layman’s terms… That You cannot regulate free men, but the government has a right to regulate and police commerce… Which is what happened…. but this article says YES, Its not a PRIVELDGE but a God given Right to Travel in an Automobile…. and That You NEED a license to OPERATE a VEHICLE not Autmobile, to ENGAGE in COMMERCE, where you would then be considered… A DRIVER….
The law is simple…the legal person interpreting legal trying to only make you see legal intentionally confuses you without giving you the full disclosure of the ticket where the ticket money is deposited the name of the bank and account number and the name of the account holder…so you know who you supposedly damaged and who you compensated…for all you know is you gave it to a name tgat is familiar to you but you really do not know what happened to that money..maybe it is in a foreign trust account that is not even here in America..yet we may be being subjected to foreign legal or laws not as Americans enforce by foreign entities profiting from us…think and over think
What u stated “regulated” does not mean they can require you to get permission to be able to use the roads that belong to the people. If a person wants to use the roads which belong to everyone for private gainā¦commerceā¦which is what the government has been given the legal “authority ” to regulate then yes you must get permission and they can regulate it. This guy is not even close to knowing what he is talking about. And if you go read the federal definition of “motor vehicle” which supersedes all state laws and definitions then let that be your first clue. Wow lmao
Apparently you don’t know how to read the first paragraph said that a person has the right of travel within his personal and business on the second paragraph it says that the city has the ability to regulate the people that are in Commerce for the benefit and welfare of the people in other words they regulate the people that are in Commerce so that the public is safe because the people in Commerce are in excess use of the city roads and create Unsafe conditions! You’re like creating a run on sentence in your own brain…. If operating while under commerce in other words do you delivering goods or having passengers you are regulated because you are in commerce not a traveler within his own personal use….. Talk about getting smarter I think you just made it everyone dumber… No right can be tax or regulated. To travel on your conveyance for personal reasons is lawful to drive a vehicle while in commerce is legal and to drive while in commerce without a license is illegal and unlawful…
What most people as well as the Officer who created this post does not understand is that “driver” and “driving” are commercial terms and have nothing to do with your right to travel. Motor Vehicle is a commercial term. Shuttlesworth v Birmingham very clearly states that you cannot be charged a fee for exercising a constitutionally protected activity. Obviously this does not apply to those who are under the age of consent as there would be liability issues. This patrol officer sounds like a clown for not looking into this a little deeper. He should know that Blacks Law Dictionary used by the US Supreme Court has different definitions for driving and traveling than does Websters. Hendrick v. Maryland has nothing to do with your right to travel but was the Federal Govt. allowing states to set speed limits and assess fines to drivers in commerce who don’t comply with the rules for commercial use not for travelers exercising a God given right. I have personally been to court in California on this matter. Look up Charles Sprinkle v California and you might be enlightened.
I see this article was posted a year ago… commentator did a poor job on his research…only 1 caselaw and it is an state Supreme court…just an suggestion,,,do an more extensive search of caselaw in U.S. Supreme and lower federal courts.. I could give you caselaw after caselaw,,,but then you wouldn’t have no fun… Mr. Commentator,,, you sir,,, are wrong…
What is lawful is illegal and what is unlawful is legal. Lawful is of nature and what is of nature is of God and life. Legal deals in legal fictions/corporations. One is of man and the other of God. A license deals in legal terms and it only offers benefits and privileges. It is granted by the government. Rights on the other hand deals in lawful terms. It is of nature and God. Only God grants rights. 9/10th of the law deals in possession of property. Law is derived by property usage. The Laws of God teaches us that we can’t serve two masters. Genesis 1:26-28 tells us that our Creator commanded us to take dominion of the earth and everything in it. The scriptures tells us that God owns the cattle on a 1,000 hills. Maxim of Law states that he who creates controls what he has created. God gave us equitable use of his creation. To accept a license outside of commercial means is fraud. You are accepting jurisdiction of the state over you.
YES, you need a drivers license to drive… you don’t need a DRIVERS license to travel.. DRIVING means you are engaged in commerce… period… its trips so many people up.. they see, see you DO need a diverse license to drive… and thays obvious.. they just don’t know what vehicle means and what driver means..
You butchered those paragraphs. Did they teach you how to read at the police academy? You left words out, and you even changed words! I’ll bet a hundred dollars that police are trained to read laws in this manner so that later, when they get into trouble, all they have to say is “I misread it.” And that’s where qualified immunity comes into play. It’s all bullspit.
You said the word may meaning they might not they could and where does that state state supreme court get their laws from cuz you can’t debunk that State’s laws then use it to your advantage advantage to prove your point🤡 plus you didn’t mention anything about commercial versus so maybe do a little bit more homework homework is in order… for I am a commercial driver
NO YOU ARE WRONG…CONTINUE ON WITH YOUR INVESTIGATION, IF THIS IS WHAT YOU ARE PAID TO DO. PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND HOW A SHORT POLICE OFFICER TRAINING COURSE COULD HELP YOU IN ANY WAY OF UNDERSTANDING LAW. THIS IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THINKING THAT YOU KNOW AND ACTUALLY KNOWING WHAT YOU KNOW. POLICE OFFICERS ARE AS INDICATED POLICY ENFORCERERS. POLICY ENFORCERS WORK FOR THE CORPORATION NOT FOR THE PEOPLE…PERIOD
The state has the right to regulate the rules of the road and all 50 states have adapted that you do need a driver’s license, license plate, registration and proof of insurance to drive a motor vehicle on public roads and highways. You have the right to travel in a plane, train, horse-drawn carriage or bus or even walk without having to have a driver’s license, but if you are the operator of any of the former said Vehicles you have to have a driver’s license
It would take a article alot longer to expain why you are wrong or right. The fact is there is plenty of case law about the right to travel. Alas we don’t need case law; the supremacy clause of the Constitution is plain as day as well as our Bill of Rights. If I don’t have to show you my papers or effects persuant to the 4th amendement why would i need to provide you with a permision slip to use the road?
Have you even learned yet that the United States is a federal corporation not a country ? Need to learn that first in the u.s.c. tittle 28 3002 or Padge 3002 1st a paragraph that is 15a that is definitions and meanings scroll down to 15a its a federal corporation not a country lol yea since 1871 when congress ilegal unconstitutional formed and funded Washington DC and changed 1 word to protect the corporation rights and take away the people’s i5 whent from we the people to by the people
You should really read a number of cases and do some more studying before assuming youve solved the puzzle. This case was about arbitrary suspensions. Thats correct, however, these judges give hints to other issues in rhese cases. Its complex. Theres more than one issue or one case surrounding the right to travel. The biggest problem is that weve are been taught a false narrative and it is exremely difficult to unlearn all of the lies weve been told or to figure out the ommisions that arent mentioned to us, leaving most of us completely ignorant of realiity or the truth. Also. mostpeople arent willing to put forth the effort it takes to unlearn the lies then relearn the truth. It takes hundreds or thousands of hours of research and endless reading. the information if hidden, hard to find, cencored, and you only find a little here and a little there. No one reads anymore and the truth sounds like crazy nonsense to most people. That was the plan. If any of us figure it out, everyone else will call us crazy. Gueas what . the few crazies are the smart ones. You sir, Mr Patrolman are ignorant of the law and the trurh. You are taught wrong kept inthe dark, and sebt out to violate the rights of men and women everywhere. You probably think you are writing tickets to men and wwomen? Nope! You have very little jurisdiction over and living man or woman. You are writing ticket to legal fictions owned by the government, if you can call it that. Its a de facto, military, insurgence controlled by bankers and the ultra wealthy of Brittain. Im over simplifying. NO matter becuase you will laugh this off in ignorance and you will never put in the time to learn the frauad, deception, and theft thats transpiring all over the country evryday. You wont because you like the false narative and the artificial power . You dont have any desire to learn the truth or you would have. atrust me, you are not the smart man you think you are. Youre career is based on fiction and you havent any clues as to why. < Some hints. Drivers licenses are for commercial drivers. Persons making money on the highways, Truck drivers, limo drivers. Road pirates (police, patrolman),, drivers are involved in commerce. The entire Dept of Motor Vehicle codes in every state get there authority from DOT. The DOT is all commercial. So why cant non commercial travelers travel in automobiles without a licence. This is way over most peoples heads, but its not complicated, just hsrd to unlearn the bullshit. They cannot becuase they dont know who they are and /or cant proove it. They also dont behave like who they really are. Everyone is playing their fictional charactor rhat the astate made for them and owns, Therefore we all live and operate our motor vehicles in a fictional world of commerce the Congress has plenary poer over and these charactors or persons that we play and that they presume us to be, because we answer to the fictional name, is owned by the fictional governments that we are now enslaved by. We are the only country on the planet, in all of history that has a Republican for of government. One where the people hold the power and the government follows our instruction, They are servants. WE are not a Democracy like they have lead us to believe. A democracy is a step away from a dictatorship at any time. ;WE have been cleverly fooled and now we are being treated as slaves, but we are so dumbed down and ignorant that we dont know it. The wealth of this Nation that we people own, is being siphoned away at an alarming rate and still no one has a clue. A small number of people have a clue, but not enough. A smart man would take the little gld nuggets I sprinkled here and start doing his own research to find out what Im talking about and to learn for himself if tits true. Dont take my word for it, however, I am a man of my word and have no desire to decieve anyone. Rather I;d like to awaken as many as possible. For some, sadly, they will never be capable of awakning to to truth. Too much Television, too much cool aid, or just too happy with everything. Thats ok. This message will peak the interest of very few until they lose all of their freedom and realize they should have listened to the crazy ones a little closer and asked questions, and maybe they should have read and learned for themselves. One more hint: With alsost anything you know about government, law, Law, or democrcracycontrolling the masses), just flip it 180 degrees and your truth will usuaklly be sitting right there. Think of it as a mirror reflaction. They hid the truth right in front of alll of us for all to see, but most of us never see it. Dont fee bad. It took me almost 50 years and when I finally saw it, I couldnt believe that not one perdon from my past knew it or at least never made mention of it. This gift of freedon and the land of opprtunity is being stolen from us all as we watch like idiots with smiles on our faces. The enemies are all among us fueled by greed and a thirst for power. The indoctrinatin begins at Birth,, We are given our chartors or personas alsost right rhen. We learn to be and play our personas so that we never learn who we are. Who we were at our Birth. Hint. We are men and women, but thats not who we are presumed to be. Its not who the tax, areest, imprision, control. Men and women contol their public servants. Its not a riddle and its not complex. WE have the right to travel as men . Subject dont have rights. only granted privliges, like a drivers licence. Contractors for the state dont have immunity from being sues when they violate your rights under color of law. Hmmmmm>>>>> The UNITED STATES is a bankrupt corporation. How could thay tell anyone what to do? They cant so they created a fictional world with fictional charactors, fictional rues rhat resemble real Laws(color of law), and that which you create, you control. Spunds like communism? Guess what ? it is, Yayyyyyy!!!! Own nothing and like it. We are already there . They just need to take away our guns, money, and protections and then they can announce it . Shut up and do as we say or we will rape your wife and shoot your entire family in a public display. All law enforcement enforces no Law . They are federal polices funded by federal funds and sent out to terrorize us whom they are tht are their enmies. Read the. Its all written . WE are considered to be the enemy. Trading with the Enemy Act. Goole it while you still can. Im out. Godspeed and WAKE UP please. We all need to unite and put stupid differences aside . WE are an the verge of something very ugly or we can take whats ours and have heavan on earth like we should. Lots of love to everyone. Christopher-Lee.
Well you butchered Thompson v. Smith. I dont know if you dont know how to read properly or what. Without understanding the facts of the case. Thompson was accused of being a drunkard. And the evidence basically supported that accusation 😂. I haven’t been in law school in 26yrs. But this was actually a really hot topic my 2nd year. It really does boil down to, we the people have a god given right to LIFE,LIBERTY, PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. Now ask yourself what does the mean?? Do you have a right to work? Dependent on what Communist state you live in, the state thinks thats a privilege and you will have to pay the occupational privileges tax! LIBERTY? freedom of movements, 250 years ago and even when this case was cited. Most people got on there horse and went into town. And if a city or police dept said you have to pay us $1 a year to ride your nag into town. The people would have hung the chief of police. Kinda like officer O’Brian of the NYC south side regiment in 1907. He thought he was going to make everyone who drove deliveries after 9pm pay a fee for disturbing the peace. He received a beating and was hung naked from his ankles in what is now called the bronx😂. There is a absolute ton of wrong with requiring certain licenses, as well as the merger in 1968 from a traffic court into a Commercial Codes/criminal system for hearing such violations. How can it be a criminal court if the judges refuse a trial by jury? But the biggest problem is nearly every states judges receive a kickback into their retirement fund, a set fee.
It is easier for any person to enforce something like taking money that they do not have to take any responsibility or liability for …if every person writing out the ticket had to be responsible under their own name and be liable for the legal words they present on the ticket where they do not have a bar number to interpret legal they would never write a ticket unless the tickets are true and a fact ..but truth and facts would not be profitable they the corporate body created their own laws called legal where assumptions and lies are the absolute business where prophets of truth inverted into profits of assumptions and lies.. corporations without taking any liability plainly steal from living people responsible for all liabilities…this is where they continue to confuse most of us…the corporations are supposed to pay taxes and only regulate their own people benefiting having paid under them for the rest of the people not under the corporation to be safe from corporate activities…the living people are the ones that is supposed to receive benefiting from the taxes collected from corporate paid taxes…they have you turned around..it is even more confusing when you are people paid under corporations because you then do not realize you are the body operating within the corporation and there they make you pay their corporate taxes…the truth is you should want high tax for corporations since they take all the resources from your living source with them having no liabilities and because you as an employee paid under the corporation they make you pay their taxes due only to corporations since you feel the effects of the burden of taxes you vote less taxes for corporations which in turn you steal from yourself where corporations are supposed to compensate you for the resources taken from your living source then the amount you earn they regulate and make you believe you owe their taxes.
You left out “for hire”. Dont ignore that asshole. You are wrong. How many cases do i need to cite? Im at 43 and increasing. Understand, These so called laws are legal procedure, And apply to those EMPLOYED upon the roads. Thats MOTOR VEHICLE CODE. Because a motor vehicle is defined as ” An automobile employed upon the highways or roads, for pay, fees, wages, directly or indirectly. If im on the clock, i nee a license if not, I do not. I understand public safety. But if i am going 60 in a 55 and the ONLY other vehicle visible for miles is the patrol behind me, He cant use public safety as an excuse. Not only that, If im not endangering the public, there is no emergency, and its a felony, accoridng to motor vehicle code, for enforcement to use emergency lights in a non emergency situation. Ive personally won 2 insurance cases. To demand insurance on my own property is to make a LAW, that benefits corporations. Specifically the HANDFUL of insurance compaines. You federally, cannot force me to do business with them. Insurance is a GAMBLE at best. Its my responsibility to provide reparations for damages done if i dont have insurance. But to pay a fine for not doing business with Crooks, Is extortion, coercion due to the usurping of the constituon, by legal procedure.
Your article is incorrect. Ok… Here’s how it goes. First it’s The Constitution. You have The Right to travel freely on State and City Highways and Streets without being molested by Government Officials, unless you’ve committed a crime. That’s The Constitution. 2nd, The Public Roads belong to The Public. Our Tax Paying Dollars pay for The Public Roads. That means The Public Roads belong to The People. 3rd… Driver’s license is only required for commercial use. If you look at your Driver’s License, you will notice it says; class C. Which means for commercial use. You only need a driver’s license if your job requires you to drive. If youre driving a company truck, or if youre taxi driver, work for some pizza company, delivering pizza or foods. Uber driver. If your income depends on you driving. Then yes, you need a driver’s license. But if you’re driving your own personal car/truck for personal car, then no, you don’t need a driver’s license. Going to and from work, going to the market, going to the park, ect. No, you dont need a Driver’s license. Hope this helps somebody out there.
Is being told to ” get a licence ” unsolicited/ unconsented legal advice.? If so have you got a licence to publish legal advice across to people on youtubes comments ?? I find it really wierd. It sounds like this cop is ordering people to get a licence somethimes. ?? Anyone ? ( Who actually knows) legal advice from a cop. Funny.
Look into federal motor carrier safety act at u,s, codes title 49 this the regulation on what congress have been granted vested powers congress can only commercial Drivers which is a professional trade, truck drives tow truck drivers, taxi drivers,bus drivers chauffeurs are professional drivers whom are compensated for hire and receive money while on the people’s public roads for hire, mean getting pay while using. The people’s public roads if it is public you the people don’t have to pay to used public things unless they use it for hire which is a profit and gain a corporation can not use the people’s public entities or roads without compensating the people for ware and tear on the commercial level therefore an excise tax is applied a excise tax is corporate business tax for business title 49 FMCSA is the regulation the government agency are to be regulated by so read it first and then read you case and read the federalis papers to find the intent of the founding fathers then cite Constitutional on the right to travel, view then view the definition in commercial driving study facts not half truths, title 49 fmcsa.
Yeah I called bullshit when I saw a article of a traveler lol. If you could just claim traveler. Trust and belive there would be a lot more people jumping on that new traveler driving package 😂. Come on people if it sounds to good to be true dont fall for it. Just be a true free proud american and exercise your right to not GAF and do whatever you gotta do. But when you get caught and you will. Just take responsabilty for your actions. Giving the police a hard time about it. Will never help your situation. Stand up for your rights always. But also just accept when you know you’re in the wrong. Its hard out here and some people cant afford to pay tickets and insurance. But still gotta work and driving without those things is the only opitions. Some understand some dont. Thats life
The forgotten legal maxim is that free people have a right to travel on the roads which are provided by their servants for that purpose, using ordinary transportation of the day. Licensing cannot be required of free people, because taking on the restrictions of a license requires the surrender of a right. The driver’s license can be required of people who use the highways for trade, commerce, or hire; that is, if they earn their living on the road, and if they use extraordinary machines on the roads. If you are not using the highways for profit, you cannot be required to have a driver’s license. Us law books but yet he called people stupid 😂😂😂 bruh u need to do some more research
You Mr. Baldhead are clearly NOT for us the people. You ONLY fictitiously present as though you are. A Driver needs a driver’s lic. Any person NOT dealing in commerce while in their private property and who are simply enjoying life without harming themselves, another nor another’s property AND HAS NOT CONTRACTED with the state DDS/DMV does NOT need a drivers lic because they are NOT a driver by “legalease” definition. Go kick rocks for working against the ppl in confusion. You know better so DO right. 😝
Personal liberty largely consists of the Right of locomotion — to go where and when one pleases — only so far restrained as the Rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but the common Right which he has under his Right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this Constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s Rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” II Am.Jur. (1st) Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p.1135 The Oregon Supreme Court ruled Kalich v. Knapp, 73 Or. 558) “the legislature has no power to regulate the people or their automobiles. In order to violate my rights regardless of where I reside they are federally protected which means they’ll need to break their oath! Amendment XIV Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
No need to use court cases, because the state laws already adhere to the opinions of those court cases. Every state law requires a driver license to operate a motor vehicle over public roads. Every state law defines a motor vehicle in regard to a driver license as being a self-propelled vehicle. Every state defines a vehicle to mean every device in, upon, or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway. Therefore, a motor vehicle is either a self-propelled device that is actively being used to transport, even if the device may not be used to transport; or it is a self-propelled device that may be used to transport upon a highway, even if it isn’t actively being used to transport at the time. If the car is registered, it is a device that may be used to transport, irrespective of it’s usage, making that device a self-propelled vehicle and thusly required to only be driven by a licensed driver. If the car is not registered, but it is actively being used to transport upon the highway, then the car is required to be driven by a licensed driver, as well as having to be registered. If the car is neither actively used nor registered to be used to transport persons or property upon a highway, then the device is not a vehicle because it is not a device in, upon, or by which any person or property is, or may be transported and therefore cannot be a self-propelled vehicle, and therefore cannot be a motor vehicle, and therefore not required to only be driven by licensed drivers.
if you are a self responsible person you have the RIGHT to travel over rights of way that preexisted the name and numbered roadways with all of the rules and regulations dreamed up by someone somewhere else in charge of regulating commerce…..because who in their right mind would hire a bunch of public servants to harass and extort money from us when we have harmed no one?…. so what if my “wheelchair’ looks like a honda civic or a F350, it’s my disability to not be able to carry my stuff so far away without the means of mechanical advantage. If a man can be called a woman and bribery called lobbying, my vehicle is my wheelchair and exercising a right to get from here to there isn’t a lawfully regulated activity… UNLESS I cause harm or loss to someone else (a clear and present danger to others) and I am unwilling to be self responsible for fixing the problem. Statism is the most dangerous of religions and the police are the profits. If you haven’t noticed, the streets aren’t very safe because people are not being held responsible for their actions, their insurance company is. They play the numbers though because paying out more than you bring in isn’t a good business model. My grandma said it best, “if you don’t have a bumper on your car that can get bumped, that’s your own damn fault”. Open your eyes, because freedumb is the sound of a broken liberty bell.
If you dont ever transport over the highways, stop registering your car as device that is used to transport over the highways. Not only does having a tagplate tell everyone, especially law enforcement officers that probably have “enough on their plate” to deal with as it is, that the car you are using is a device used to transport, it will thus require you to have a valid driver license to drive your car, even if you only travel. It’s unmotivated.