France, Spain, and the United States are the leading destinations for international tourism, with France holding the top spot for over 30 years. In 2023, France welcomed over 100 million international tourists, accounting for 8 of the global tourism market. The UN Tourism Data Dashboard provides statistics and insights on key indicators for inbound and outbound tourism at global, regional, and national levels.
China was the country with the highest outbound tourism expenditure worldwide in 2023, with Chinese travelers spending 196.5 billion U.S. dollars on outbound trips that year. The United States has been at or near the top of the ranking for the past three decades, with travelers from Germany, France, and Italy.
The most visited destinations by international tourist arrivals are France, Spain, the United States, Italy, and the United Kingdom. The top tourist hotspots by country are the U.S., Spain, France, the United States, and Thailand. The top 10 countries that rely on tourism the most include Finland, Albania, Montenegro, Croatia, Brazil, Belize, Jamaica, Antigay, and Venezuela.
The UN Tourism World Tourism Barometer monitors short-term tourism trends to provide global tourism stakeholders with up-to-date analysis. This year’s rankings saw Spain, Japan, France, and Australia rank in the top five, and a newcomer at the top of the list: China.
China spent $102 billion on international tourism, followed by Germany at $83.8 billion, the United States at $83.5 billion, and the United Kingdom at $35.8 billion. The People’s Republic of China is the most populous nation in the world, with international tourism receipts of $35.8 billion.
📹 15 Cheapest Countries To Visit From India | Budget Travel | Tripoto
Has the coronavirus lockdown sent your budget haywire? That doesn’t mean you can’t plan an international trip. These 15 …
Which countries do U.S. citizens visit most?
The National Travel and Tourism Office at the U. S. Department of Commerce has revealed that Mexico and Canada were the most popular destinations for U. S. resident travelers in 2019. Mexico saw 39. 3 million visitors in one year, while 15 million made a trip to Canada. The UK followed with 3. 9 million visitors, followed by Italy and France. European countries dominate the top eight, except for the Dominican Republic in sixth place. Barbados saw six times the amount of U. S. visitors between 2014 and 2019, while Iceland and Morocco saw threefold increases. Portugal and Croatia also saw increased traveler volumes.
What are the top 10 countries with the most tourism?
France is the most visited country globally, according to data from Data Pandas. The top 10 countries for 2024 include Spain, the United States, China, Italy, Turkey, Mexico, Thailand, Germany, and the United Kingdom. France’s popularity stems from its diverse cultures, historical sites, museums, gastronomy, and romantic charm of Paris, which attracted 89. 4 million international tourists.
Which country is the biggest spender in world tourism?
China has regained its top spot as the top international tourism spender in 2023, following its recovery from the pandemic. The US led the list of top spenders in 2022, followed by France, Spain, and the USA. Chinese expenditure on travel abroad reached USD 196. 5 billion in 2023, ahead of the US, Germany, the UK, and France. Canada, Italy, India, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Korea also made up the top ten spenders. India rose to 8th place, while Italy rose from 10th to 7th place.
France, Spain, and the USA consolidated their positions as the world’s most visited destination in 2023, with 100 million international tourist arrivals. Spain followed with 85 million, followed by the US, Italy, and Turkey, which closed the top five with 55 million tourists.
What is the top 1 tourist destination in the world?
The World Tourism rankings, compiled by the United Nations World Tourism Organization, are based on the number of international tourist arrivals, revenue generated by inbound tourism, and expenditure of outbound travelers. The rankings are released six times per year and include France, Spain, the United States, Italy, and Italy. The article needs updating to reflect recent events or newly available information.
What country’s citizens spend the most on international tourism?
In 2023, China ranked highest in outbound tourism expenditure, spending 196. 5 billion U. S. dollars. This was a sharp increase from 2019, the year before the COVID-19 pandemic. The United States and Germany followed in the ranking. International tourist arrivals reached 1. 3 billion in 2023, growing significantly over the previous year but not catching up with the peak from 2019. International tourism receipts exceeded pre-pandemic levels, reaching 1.
5 trillion U. S. dollars. Europe was the global region with the highest number of inbound tourist arrivals, surpassing 700 million in 2023. Asia and the Pacific reported around 240 million inbound tourist arrivals. Overall, global tourism has recovered from the pandemic’s impact.
Which country likes tourists the most?
A report by Remitly, a digital financial services company, has identified Italy, Japan, the United States, Netherlands, Portugal, the United Kingdom, Poland, and Switzerland as the most friendly countries for tourists. The study, which used the Big 5 Personality Test, aimed to determine the most friendly countries by focusing on respondents’ “agreeableness” personality trait, which is defined by friendly, kind, and cooperative characteristics. The report highlights the importance of understanding and embracing these friendly traits in order to attract more international tourists.
Which country has the highest public spending?
In 2022, the highest levels of government expenditure were found in France (57. 3%), followed by Italy (56. 1%), Finland (53. 5%), Austria and Belgium (53. 2%), and Greece (52. 9%). The lowest levels were found in Ireland (21. 2%), Lithuania (36. 4%), Cyprus (33. 8%), and Malta (37. 3%). Switzerland (33. 0%) recorded the lowest level among EFTA countries (32. 0%). Social protection remained the most important function of government expenditure in the EU Member States and EFTA countries.
In 2022, government social protection expenditure in the EU amounted to €3, 098 billion, an increase of €113 billion compared to 2021 and equivalent to 19. 5 of GDP. The main contributor to the increase was “old age” (up by €87 billion) and “social exclusion not elsewhere classified” (up by €32 billion), which included support to households for increasing energy prices and support to refugees. The share of social protection expenditure in total expenditure decreased from 39. 7 of total expenditure in 2021 to 39. 2 of total expenditure in 2022.
What country do US citizens visit the most?
Mexico topped the list of American travel destinations in 2022, with 33. 5 million Americans visiting the country, a 17-percent increase from 2021. The National Travel and Tourism Office’s Outbound Survey of International Travelers revealed that the United Kingdom was the top overseas destination, attracting 3. 7 million American travelers. Mexico’s popularity reflects the country’s growing interest in international travel, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Which countries’ citizens travel the most internationally?
The most popular countries for travelers are Finland, the United States, Sweden, and Denmark. Finland leads the list with 7. 50 total trips per person per year, followed by the United States at 6. 70, followed by the Swedish at 6. 30, the Danish at 5. 30, Norwegians at 5. 20, Hong Kong and New Zealand residents at 4. 30 trips apiece, Canadians at 4. 10, Australians at 3. 80, and the French at 3. 50 annual trips.
The Finnish people make up the majority of inbound and outbound travels due to their high income, lower unemployment rates, and travel-oriented culture. The American people tend to make more inbound trips due to their diverse geographical area and rich cultural heritage, and prefer to explore their own country. Sweden is also a great place to live, as it offers security and quality of life, leading to maximum domestic trips.
Denmark is the best place for traveling due to its accessibility through air, rail, sea, and road, as well as its Scandinavian family venues. Scandinavian people are wealthy and have higher standards of living, often traveling abroad to escape the cold winter season. With a lower unemployment rate and high cost of living, they often choose to travel abroad for better value and even own holiday homes abroad.
On the other hand, Americans prefer inbound trips due to high costs and work culture, with fewer holidays and domestic trips for friends and family.
What country relies most on tourism?
In 2023, the United States ranked highest in international tourism receipts, with inbound tourism receipts reaching nearly 176 billion U. S. dollars. This figure is a sharp increase from 2019, despite a decrease from the previous year before the COVID-19 pandemic. Spain and the United Kingdom followed with 92 billion and 74 billion U. S. dollars respectively. France topped the list of countries with the highest number of inbound tourist arrivals, with 100 million arrivals in 2023.
Spain and the United States followed with over 85 million and 66 million arrivals, respectively. The total contribution of travel and tourism to GDP worldwide was estimated to be just under 10 trillion U. S. dollars in 2023, with over 300 million travel and tourism jobs worldwide.
Which countries do citizens travel the most?
The most popular countries for travelers are Finland, the United States, Sweden, and Denmark. Finland leads the list with 7. 50 total trips per person per year, followed by the United States at 6. 70, followed by the Swedish at 6. 30, the Danish at 5. 30, Norwegians at 5. 20, Hong Kong and New Zealand residents at 4. 30 trips apiece, Canadians at 4. 10, Australians at 3. 80, and the French at 3. 50 annual trips.
The Finnish people make up the majority of inbound and outbound travels due to their high income, lower unemployment rates, and travel-oriented culture. The American people tend to make more inbound trips due to their diverse geographical area and rich cultural heritage, and prefer to explore their own country. Sweden is also a great place to live, as it offers security and quality of life, leading to maximum domestic trips.
Denmark is the best place for traveling due to its accessibility through air, rail, sea, and road, as well as its Scandinavian family venues. Scandinavian people are wealthy and have higher standards of living, often traveling abroad to escape the cold winter season. With a lower unemployment rate and high cost of living, they often choose to travel abroad for better value and even own holiday homes abroad.
On the other hand, Americans prefer inbound trips due to high costs and work culture, with fewer holidays and domestic trips for friends and family.
📹 What’s the best country to live in?
Discover the shortcomings of using GDP to measure a country’s well-being, and what alternatives can be used to gauge quality of …
Something i love about TED-Ed articles is that while many people answer questions with direct facts and all, a lot of the “answers” given by these articles often makes us think more about what are we asking and how we can come up with an answer for ourselves, i like this, i feel it helps me develop a better critical way of thinking, and also in ery easy to digest format that doesn’t hurt my brain but neither doubts my inteligence to understand a wild varety of topics
My measurement for the best place to live would probably depend heavily on stress levels. Do people generally enjoy their work? Are they confident that they could access quality medical care in a health emergency? Are they optimistic or pessimistic about the future? Do they have friends and/or family whom they could turn to during a difficult time? Do they feel that people outside their inner circle can be trusted? Do they feel confident that they could weather a financial emergency?
If the world used GNH over GDP to measure how suitable a country is for residency, I think we will be able to see how people from different places feel about how their living standards based on their experience. We can share our perspectives as well, thus everyone can learn which countries seem best to live in at the moment. But, we should take a moment to find anything good about our own countries even if they are not the best.
As someone living in a 3rd world country, going to 1st world countries to find greener pastures is the usual dream. The cost of living is a great consideration since many places are so expensive. New Zealand, Netherlands, and Australia are usually the most preferred countries that my fellow countrymen want to migrate in.
I grow up in a pretty rich life in dubai to now a somewhat poor life in a 3rd world country due to poor parent choices. i can tell you living in a “Poor country” isn’t great, If you dont have connections or rich parents everything is a Million times harder to do. And knowing your previous life standards makes everything else much miserable.
As a Costarrican, born and raised, I have to disagree with the final outcome from the article. While I understand that growth is somewhat environmentally responsible, there’s more to this. For example, traffic in Costa Rica is just absurd, the accessibility to buy and build your own house is completely off the table for the medium and lower classes, and the price for public services is just off the charts. I understand this is a paradise with multiple benefits, but most of those benefits are only available for foreigners that have the possibility to afford them. Costarricans are getting out of the picture every single day.
This is where Gandhi’s village republics holds sway. I’ve lived in many countries, Switzerland, Indonesia, Japan, Peru, Chile and about 20 odd countries, but after 20 years of being a nomad, here’s what I realised. Any place with a strong sense of community and progressivism will always have a better quality of life. I am currently living and working in a small state in India’s Northeast called, Meghalaya. It’s remote as can be (from the capital of India), but it has a strong sense of community (enshrined by an age-old principle called, ‘Khlaw Adong’ or village forests protected and kept apart by the villagers for conserving water and bio-diversity) and they take pride in universal education and healthcare (something I saw during coronovirus, when not many people died because of lack of healthcare services). In all other matrices, it is a LLDC (or least-developed landlocked country) but what do you know!!
GDP is just a measure of transactions. The more a country spend, the higher its GDP. It doesn’t quite work for countries with high savings rate. Not to mention, GDP is tied to the exchange rate. If the currency is widely used around the globe, it can prop up the currency value, which in turn, inflate the GDP.
While there’s nothing wrong with figuring out the “best country” to live in with GDP or GDH there are other factors that should be factored in too. We also have to look at the unspoken things which are generally not considered or included in lists such as these for example- racism and discrimination. A country which is the best place to live for a certain community might not be the best fit for some other.
– Security – Nature/eco-friendly/sustainability (beyond sustainability, i would focus on the quality and availability of mountains, rivers, fjords, etc.) – Stability (i would emphasize on GDP per capita, but thats relatively because some scandinavian countries have high gdp pc but also high taxes, so thats relative. still, i would focus on high gdp per capita) – Education (public and private) – Family friendly countries (i mean, if the country is good to raise kids)
The answer is simple and it is that there is not just one but a list countries that are the best to live in. These countries have the happiest populations, as citizen happiness is the ultimate determiner of wether a country is good to live in. Two of these countries are Bhutan and Costa Rica as listed in the article. The others are Iceland, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands, Luxembourg and New Zealand. All other countries in the world have disgruntled, disjointed and varying degrees of unhappy populations with lower levels of equality
As someone from a region with inconsistent economic growth, insecurity I think what determines the best country for me to live in will be how secure the citizens feel, do they feel confident leaving their home every day knowing they will come back in one peace? Also what government policies do the country have in place to promote economic growth? Is there ease of doing business in the country?
I think it is better to judge a country by collecting various kinds of data and analying it than to judge it by only one number. For example, although GDP doesn’t factor in education, we can get more reliable data by examining other information such as the number of teachers per students as well as GDP.
Thank you for posting this article, it gives a lot of people options for future planning, I think it’s not just GDP to measure the livability of an area, every place will have its unsatisfactory parts, and our choices will also be Influenced by factors such as growth environment and emotions, but despite this, there will always be a livable city that you recognize.
While I do think we need more holistic approaches like HDI rather than GDP per capita to measure how good a country is to live in; when it comes to an income/money based metric, I think that a ‘median wealth’ measurement would make more sense than average wealth/income/GDP measurement. It’s interesting and quite telling to see how countries stack up when comparing mean vs median wealth. The disparities tend to show very drastically in some countries. US mean: 505,421 / US median: 79,274 France mean: 299,355 / France median: 133,559 This means that while the average wealth in the US is nearly double the average wealth in France. The average/everyday French person is nearly twice as wealthy as the average/everyday American. The wealth in France is spead much more equitably while the greater wealth in the US is held by a small number of people while most people are worse of. When you look at mean wealth, the US ranks #2 in the world only after Switzerland…but when you look at the median wealth, the US drops all the way down to #26 below Israel, South Korea, Austria, Taiwan, Spain, Italy, Japan, Canada, the UK, France, the Netherlands, and so many other countries. The US average is just skewed by a group of billionaires who own more than the rest of the country combined. Source for my information: Credit Suisse – Global Wealth Databook 2021: credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/global-wealth-databook-2021.pdf
Since everyone has their own unique goals in life, it’s better to develop a set of metrics, rather than one “good for you” scale, so everyone can make weighted judgement, based on their goals. Although we live in ever changing world, it’s better to re-evaluate how important one or other scales are, for public as time goes by.
I guess I would go with average income and minimum income, freedom of press, cultural preservation, diversity, average life expectancy, education, access to medical care and educational institutions and industrial output as in what and how much does the economy produces. Thanks people behind Ted Ed for creating and sharing these wonderful articles with us which cover a diverse range of topics – from art and history to science and quantum mechanics.
I really like Bhutan’s approach; instead of measuring abstract things like wealth or development, it measures how content people are with life. Personally I would be happiest if I was safe, but also a strong sense of community and satisfaction with simple living. The number on my paycheck or having the newest iPhone doesn’t really mean much if your constantly unhappy and alone, which I find is a big problem in developed countries like the Nordics or Western Europe.
I do think international trade regimes do matter. When global production hubs are shifted to third world countries, the western nations can build up advanced sustainable economies. The third world countries are forced to keep their labour markets unregulated. So wages are at subsistence. So the problems of environment unsustainability and poverty inequality are shifted to third world countries. In a globalised world, it’s unfair to calculate standard of living only on internal metrics, while external forces are playing an equally imp role.
Any country could be the best place to live. It comes down in large part to what you value and whether you have the resources to tap into the value from that country. For instance, if your idealic lifestyle means living by the beach, but you live in a high GDP country that is land locked, you might have a better quality of life living in a “poorer” country where you can access picturesque beaches. I’m from NYC, and when I moved to SE Asian and rented a beautiful bungalow overlooking blue ocean and white sand with friendly people all around, I felt like I won the lottery.
I came up with 10 measurements for if a country is Good or Bad : 1. Education/Literacy % 2. Life Expectancy 3. Family size ; How many children a female births in a family with an income above the poverty line 4. Crime Rate 5. General income ; Not excluding any jobs 6. Income to Population Size Comparison ; Not excluding ANY civilian living in the country 7. Voting Rights ; Who can vote/What’s the requirements for voting ? 8. Poverty 9. Minimum Wage 10. Import/Export Comparison ; In which/how many industries are you independent/dependent ? If I missed any important ones, feel free to add it in the comments.
THE BEST metric would be one that measures the amount of hours of work needed in a given weak to earn a living wage, with the lower the number being better. That’s the one thing that translates across all cultures and the one thing the most people care about. You’re ignoring one HUGE flaw in these types of calculations and that’s how much anyone funding this type of research would want to avoid any type of conclusions that would lead to the working class wanting to work less or asking why the ‘leading’ class doesn’t do more for what they get.
My best friend is from Montana and I’m from the north of China. We haven’t met since Covid started. I would never understand why he chose to live in China. He feels the same way about me never wanting to go back. Of course people have different definition of happiness. but it’s us! We are so similar. Well, I guess I just wrote this because I miss my friend. And I also like the article didn’t give a specific ranking of the countries
Majority of people wanna live in developed countries. In addition, if people choose some destination for living, first and foremost, they need pay attention some aspects like education, health, strong communication and living standard. In addition to this, economic condition is also important for living. I mean, these countries can give opportunities in order to find lucrative job for dwellers. So, GDP per capita is perfect in county which we choose, we may find all types of opportunities like high education and so on. Nowadays, the main source of intensifying the GDP are manufacturing or exporting products.
I believe any of the countries in Scandinavia would be a solid contender, from visits I have made I can confidently say the people there are some of the happiest, most relaxed and friendliest people in the world. The culture is rich, the standard of life is fantastic, most people have a strong wage and a safe home, and crime rates are remarkably low. Additionally the landscapes are lovely and the carbon footprint of all 5 countries is brilliant. I hope one day I will be moving to live in Scandinavia, although I am still deciding which country and where.
A somewhat more objective measure to “best country to live in” is to measure birth rates/immigration inflows after controlling for other correlating development indices (education/wealth etc). With the logic being that people, given opportunity, will flock/settle in the places that they perceive as best. E. G Asian countries, which otherwise rank highly among other development indices, have extremely low birth rates and high emigration abroad. I. E they are relatively less desirable to people who otherwise have the skills/opportunity to move elsewhere.
I think that the best countries in the world to live in: Australia (despite the housing crisis) but the country has nice weather in the livable parts of the country . The country has a great education and healthcare. Although access to healthcare and education varies. Another country is New Zealand. Same points as Australia but New Zealand is the best due to beautiful natural scenery.
GDP and GDP per capita do not measure overall wealth of the average individual it averages the economy divided by every single person in an economy. As an example, if a country has a GDP of one billion but one person holds 500 million dollars, the GDP per capita remains the same. As an example, the GDP per capita of the US is 50,000 but the average amount of wealth held by the average American is 25,000 due to wealth inequality.
The best place to live is usually not about where you live (exception: if you’re starving, living in a war zone, living in North Korea, or the like). Besides this, you are not necessarily lucky just because you live in a place with a good political system. You can be lucky in life even if you live in a poor corrupt country, and you can be unlucky even if you live in a modern country. It’s not mainly about money, yes you need enough money to get by, but you don’t need abundance. I am from Norway, I am ethnically Norwegian and I live in Norway. I am not lucky, I have been exposed to a lot of pain in my life. What I have experienced can be experienced all over the world, and is neither worse nor better regardless of country. And for some, the weather and mentality are more important than materialism. Moreover, most Norwegians are not rich. Most are working class, most have years of student loans and mortgages. The country is rich in resources, the people are not richer than in other western countries, yes the amount of income is higher, but in return one must take into account the insanely expensive cost of living
Mongolia is one of the best countries to live in. This is due to its low crime rate, stable democratic government, and welcoming population. Additionally, Mongolia is an attractive destination for those seeking economic opportunities. With 16% of the world’s reserves of rare earth elements, Mongolia is well positioned to be a major player in the global market. Furthermore, its population is highly educated, providing a talented workforce for businesses looking to invest in the country. Mongolia is often underrated and overlooked by the rest of the world due to a lack of awareness about the country. This ignorance is a blessing for those who have knowledge about Mongolia and recognize its potential, as it offers opportunities for investment, business development, and quality of life.
Well India is not the country if you are looking for quality of life because amount of population here with less land is creating problems in almost every aspect of life – weather : extremely hot in summers, healthcare, pollution, per capita income, unemployment, crime rates, traffic, less greenery cause of more clearing of land for human needs, economically unstable and many more reasons .
For me, sustainability is crucial, a country wherein you can illustrate your future and try to make it happen, a country full of warmth and grass, and people who rely on knowledge… and I also yearn for an honest government… a country that cares for its nation… I think it’s close to Scandinavian countries like Denmark or Norway… Hope to experience it…
To me best country to live in is the one that meet these requirements: 1. Free public healthcare 2. Free public education till tertiary level 3. Affordable housing 4. Reliable public transportation 5. Strict employment laws to prevent exploitation I don’t mind taxes being high as long as all of these requirements are met. Though I doubt that there are an irl country that meets all of these.
I opened the article and jumped to 3:35 and as I was expecting. There was no need to watch a article where they can’t give a coherent answer. ”it all depends” is a lazy overused useless response that count as no answer, that can be given to any question provided you deliver it with some philosophical jargon to sound smart. The lack of originality in Ted is starting to smell.
The fact that Costa Rica has grown as a country more than almost any other is actually pretty telling. Not only is Costa Rica getting richer, happier, and more healthy, but they also have NO military. They’re a peaceful nation that, from my point of view, doesn’t really see the point in wasting money on a military when bloodshed doesn’t need to occur. Costa Rica is a great nation, and one to admire heavily considering its neighbors Nicaragua, Honduras, and El Salvador. It’s also a nation with tons of flora and fauna, so it’s a visual sight as well as a mental and emotional one. Anyway, thanks for making this article, cause I enjoy learning more and more about the countries and the world around me.
For me personally the most important thing is human rights and human freedom. I suffered from many years of forced labour and abuse in a military labour camp in my home country. I feel that the GDP is nothing when the country itself puts the people through years of forced labour and in miserable conditions and without payment. The most basic thing that is ignore is your ability to make decisions about your own life. From my point of view, and I don’t care what people say about economy, my home country israHELL is at the bottom of the list in the entire world when it comes to quality of life. At least now I have the option to fly away from this labour camp country.
The correct metric is Median Discretionary GDP PPP per capita. Median takes into account the “average person” instead of the “average income”, which is a better metric of how community as a whole and the individual does. Discretionary takes into account the necessities we all have to pay, so it reflects the actual money left for happiness. PPP is the real metric when different comparing countries at the same time. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disposable_household_and_per_capita_income Unfortunately, is difficult to acquire the metric.
Frankly I have lived in US for 10 years and Europe for 7 years and moved back to India. I feel the best place to live would be the live among the less anxious group. The less anxious group can thrive where Govt or centralised influence is low and more decisions happen locally. Every where in the world a migrant will find himself among migrants so the population is volatile. Most of my best place to live are in India where security and safety exists without huge police or rules. obviously easy access to money will trumph all this and India has moved well in that direction too.
I think GDP in rich countries is unfair because most of wealth held by top wealthier than poor ones example by checking the gap between top US’s richests and poor people is completely unfair. While in low income countries the gap between rich and poor people seems to be equally. So GDP is almost measured well in less developed countries.
A country, which provides ample amount of jobs, social services: medical and educational, has a strong economy, low corruption and crime rate, and rich food sources; that’s all. Most of the people want to see their countries like this. Still, bad governance and corruption at many levels deprives them of their rights and privileges. If every government of every country decide to fight the two cause, and just do what they are supposed to do, I believe all of the countries would be a perfect place to live.
Sure. GDP has its shortcomings but it still correlates very very closely with all kinds of relevant metrics like health education crime corruption etc. To come up with something better is not a new idea. Anybody remember the HDI, the human development index? It takes into account health education and such measures. Turns out, GDP perfectly explains the HDI score. Its almost one to one. And regarding the growth of GDP, this is another often purposefully misunderstood concept. The main driver behind growth is not environmental destruction or pumping up more and more fossil fuels. It’s technological progress. And that’s not gonna stop anytime soon. So yeah. GDP keeps growing. Luckily.
Not having to stress about basic stuff like healthcare, shelter, HEALTHY food, and providing a stable environment for their children. Because if you can’t afford healthcare, afford to eat well, afford a stable house/appartment and basic stuff like that, despite working full time. Then no, that’s not the best country baby
There’s no one size fits all answer that applies for everyone, because everyone’s definition of “best” is unique and individual. Of course there will be stuff everyone wants like being safe, not desperately poor, not having corrupt officials or gangs shaking them down etc. But outside of that, one person may value security, stability and economic progress, while another may value close community bonds, artistic freedom and nature, so different countries suit different people. And anyway it’s more useful to ask which city/village or community one wants to be in also, because a country is such a big generalization and there can be lots of varied places to live even within the same country.
I would have an index that as comprised of a number of services (like education, health care, eating out at a restaurant, going to a movie), products (a car, a house, food), and things like rent. Sort of like how inflation is calculated from an index of prices. Then I would take the median hourly wage, and calculate the number of hours someone would have have to obtain all of these services at their average price. The lower this number, the better tha quality of life. In countries where certain amenities were completely unavailable there would be a penalty.
I live in the Philippines. Not super rich nor super poor country but for some reason, I have no plans to go abroad for work or to live in. Maybe because my life is already fun and stable in the Philippines. It really depends which side you’re in but tbh, I believe some Filipinos won’t be poor if they consider family planning. They can work and work and work and they’ll achieve progress but if they’re working because they have lots of kids to feed, then that’s where poverty starts.
somehow, seeing the animation of the hand picking up that sharp triangle made me anxious. Never really had an accident that would trigger such anxiety in me, but it feels wrong just picking up something sharp so casually. Maybe because it is 2D that it looks sharp for me, since having depth or 3D gives more reliable information for my brain if it is sharp or not… Then again, this isnt related to the topic, but who cares.
That’s where the better life index comes in. What do you value? Adjust the sliders and find out which one is best for you: oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/11111111111, metrics are: Housing Income Jobs Community Education Environment Civic Engagement Health Life Satisfaction Safety and Work-Life Balance
Top Six Countries that massively underachieve: Egypt—-how are you a basket case when you’re in the ideal spot for trade (Europe, Asia, and Africa surround you) Argentina—-once a great power but in decline since the 1940s. Huge agricultural potential and Bueno Aires is beautiful, yet also inflation issues Sri Lanka—let racism destroy a country. North Korea—-no explanation is needed. Once it fully opens up, it might be the most exciting place on Earth. Zimbabwe/Venezuela—Hyperinflation
This pretty much sums up wealth doesn’t always give you the happiness and is whats dividing a lot of countries and just causing more problems especially underdeveloped countries before life without much money was possible why is it a distant dream that we must chase now just to be able to live normally
Well, now that’s an interesting question 🙂 In my opinion, there are various factors that can make a country feel great or not. First and foremost, it’s mandatory to have freedom (wink-wink Russia). Clearly, economics is important, but I wouldn’t like to live in a big, overpopulated, and ultra-polluted country like China for example. Political stability is nice to have- the way citizens see their future in their country, if they feel hopeful or not. Nowadays, I think it’s nice to live in a peaceful country, geographic location and allies also matter. Then you have the two crucial pylons like health and education systems. Apart from these very important things, then there are things like weather, natural beauty, and infrastructure (roads, railway, etc…). Last but not least, the mentality of the people, the friendliness, the openness, and the safety of being able to walk the streets in most scenarios without feeling the pressure of an armed to the teeth place (I’m looking at you, US). Overall, safety is really important – the state shouldn’t be belligerent, then you have the dangers of natural hazards, wildlife, etc… Ultimately, there are lots of small things I won’t be getting into, each one with their preferences. In short, there is no perfect place on Earth that’s able to check all these boxes. But there are some that get close to the mark. For example, there are many people listing Switzerland and Scandinavian countries as good contenders, I’ll give them that, but personally, I would never be able to live there due to the cold weather and the language spoken.
I’ve had a very good lifestyle my entire life, born and living in Australia, 57 years. It’s not perfect, BUT perfection is not achievable in human form. I’m very comfortable, I have all the basic necessities, plus some & i feel very safe. Only one negative about living in Australia, it’s difficult having a good relationship with a female, because of the diversity of people and cultures, women are so different from one another, unlike being from a country that only or mostly has one culture, similar ways of thinking etc I kinda wish I was born in a dominant cultural area, as opposed to a multi cultural country, that has no real identity. I love Australia and I think it’s definitely ranked in the top 10 countries in the world to live in, BUT I would chose or prefer a country in Europe OR Central America, even south East Asia, like Switzerland Netherlands Croatia Finland Costa Rica Bali Vietnam Philippines BUT having said that, each of those countries also have negatives, no country is perfect. Am I happy living in Australia? YES why? Good health system Good education system Good quality air Most communities are very safe Cost of living is very fair Beautiful beaches NO BEARS, TIGERS OR dangerous animals living in major cities, BIG plus 🤣🤣
Don’t know about which country is the best or what is the best method to determine so, but I am fairly happy with where I am living (State: West Bengal Country: India) There is poverty, there is corruption in politics, there is political violence, education and healthcare isn’t universally available to all But it’s nice And that’s what matters the most
“What is your knowledge of native plants and animals in your area” I dont see the relevance of that. You might say people who are in touch with nature are happier, but consider this: People in poorer countries will have better knowledge of these things because they need to make due with what they have. They have no access to modern medicine or industrialized food supplies, so they have to do it themselves to survive. Some people may not care much about the details of nature around them, because they don’t have to and they can live their life however they please, in the comfort of their home. I think this point is heavily biased and doesn’t take perfectly healthy, other lifestyles into account.
If we need GDP to increase so bad, why not just create a world wide need for something that we can sell. But not like a war that needs weapons that kill people. That’s mean. Maybe the opposite, like some sort of medicine that SAVES people. All the people who obey the government get saved, GDP goes up, no more war for GDP, everybody wins 😊 🕊️✌️ 🌍
I libe in argentina, we have a current economic problem right now but besides that if i had to chose between livong here or europe/usa i would still chose to live here, we have all the climates and stations, we produce our own energy and food, we aren’t neither a rich nor poor country and we don’t depend of nobody and the most important thing is that we are very far away from any important war or place where a nuclear bomb could fall and we have good relations with almost everyone my country may not be perfect but nobody is pointing 500 nuclear warheads to it’s capital like it happens to other “better” countries.
The best country to live? Definitely my home country, Vietnam. Why? Cuzz it’s the only country to give me permanent VISA without any condition. I have all the rights to live and work. It’s where I had my education. It’s the poace where I can communicate with everyone usaing my mother tongue only. And many more reasons. I don’t think there’s any other country that treats me that good as my own country.
Never been this early to any article 😄 EDIT: Enlightening content as usual. I’d personally prioritise economic security (how often people lose and gain money via their jobs, businesses, etc.). I think it could give an overarching view of the country’s productivity, crime rate, job security, and well-being