The Airbus A350-1000first, which entered service in 2018, has a top speed of Mach 0.89, allowing it to travel at approximately 683 mph at sea level. This makes it the fastest commercial plane currently in operation. At about 35,000 feet, a passenger plane can have an average ground speed of around 300-600 knots. Commercial aircraft may cruise at almost similar speeds.
At takeoff, the average speed of a commercial airplane is anywhere between 160 and 180 mph (140 to 156 knots). As a general rule, airplanes can fly from 550 to 580 miles per hour, although this is most common with commercial planes. However, this is only an average due to wind and elements.
The average speed of a commercial flight is around 500 mph, according to the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Short-haul flights, such as those between two cities within the United States, travel between 500 and 700 mph (804 and 1126 km/h), depending on the type of plane. The fastest commercial airplane is the Airbus A380, typically used for long distances.
The average cruising airspeed for a commercial passenger aircraft that flies long distances is approximately 880-926 km/h (475–500 kn; 547–575 mph). This is about 75–85 of the speed of sound. As a general rule, the speed of passengers aircraft moves around Mach 77, equivalent to about 860 km/h, or 14 kilometers per minute. For most commercial airliners, the airplane’s cruising speed ranges between 550 and 600 mph (478 to 521 knots). Private jets typically cruise at around 500 mph.
The average cruising airspeed for commercial passenger jets is 480 to 575 mph or 770 to 930 km/h (between Mach 0.74 and Mach 0.8). Most commercial aircraft typically fly at around 460-575 mph, or 740-930 km/h, according to Flight Deck Friend. However, private jet speed can vary.
📹 Does Earth’s Rotation affect the Airplanes Speed & Flight Time
Does Earth’s Rotation Affect the Airplanes’ Speed & Flight Time? ————————————————————- NHN New Horizon …
What is the average speed of international plane?
The mean cruising speed for long-distance commercial passenger aircraft is 547-575 mph (880-926 km/h), which is 75-85% of the speed of sound. The typical cruising speed for a commercial aircraft is between 575 and 600 miles per hour, which is equivalent to 925 to 965 kilometers per hour.
What is the average speed of a fly?
House flies are fast-paced insects, with an average speed of five miles per hour and bursts of up to 15 miles per hour when threatened. Their wings beat 1, 000 times per second, producing a buzzing noise. Their sensitive antennae detect food sources and air current changes, signaling potential predators. The house fly cannot bite, but its mouthparts are modified into labella and proboscis, which gently dab liquids into its proboscis. If it encounters solid food, its enzyme-rich saliva digests it into a liquid outside the fly’s body.
M. domestica is often maligned due to its eating habits, as it consumes and contaminates various food items, including fruit, sewage, candy, road kill, and rotting garbage. The fly also contacts bacteria and viruses, which can be transferred to other animals.
How fast can a plane travel per hour?
The Airbus A320 and Boeing 737 are the most popular narrow-body commercial jets, flying at around Mach 0. 78 (587 mph). Larger airliners like the Boeing 787 and A380 are designed for long-haul routes, cruising at 0. 85 Mach (669 mph), saving more time on long flights. Private jets fly even faster, with operators able to burn more fuel to save time for passengers. Newer model private jets can fly higher than commercial airliners, with altitudes ranging from 45, 000 feet to 51, 000 feet, allowing them to cruise at Mach 0.
90 (715 mph). The fastest commercial aircraft of all time was the Concorde, introduced in 1976, designed for supersonic flight, cruising at Mach 2. 04 (1, 559 mph) and crossing the Atlantic in less than three hours.
Do planes fly at max speed?
Jets have limitations in design, as they cannot fly too slow or too fast. They are not designed to fly faster than the speed of sound, also known as Mach 1. If they exceed this, air forms shockwaves along the wing, making the aircraft uncontrollable. The Maximum Mach Number (Mmo) is the speed they cannot exceed. A machmeter is included in planes to help pilots see they are not exceeding the Mmo without relying on math. Consequently, commercial airplanes fly at a safe designed Mach number when at altitude.
How fast do average planes go?
Commercial passenger aircraft typically have an average cruising airspeed of 480 to 575 mph or 770 to 930 km/h, between Mach 0. 74 and Mach 0. 8. Popular models include the Boeing 737, Boeing 747, Boeing 777, Boeing 787, Airbus A320, Airbus A350, and Airbus A380. These aircrafts have varying cruising speeds, with the Boeing 737 cruising at Mach 0. 74 to Mach 0. 79, the Boeing 747 at Mach 0. 85, the Boeing 777 at Mach 0.
84, the Boeing 787 at Mach 0. 85, the Airbus A320 at Mach 0. 78, the Airbus A350 at Mach 0. 76, and the Airbus A380 at Mach 0. 85. These cruising speeds vary depending on the specific model and variant.
What is the average speed of a plane in KM?
In normal conditions, an aircraft travels at an average speed of 885-933 km/h. To reach altitude, cruising speed, and safely descend, it passes through different phases with corresponding speeds. To take off, a previous run at the appropriate speed is necessary. The speed is calculated based on the total weight of the aircraft, wind, airport characteristics, and weather conditions. Take-offs should be made against the wind whenever possible.
How fast can a plane go legally?
FAR 91. 117(a) states that no person can operate an aircraft below 10, 000 feet MSL at an airspeed of more than 250 knots (288 mph). This is important for turbine aircraft, as jets don’t slow down quickly and pilots often need to level off at 10, 000 feet to bleed off airspeed before continuing their descent.
Flights above 10, 000 feet MSL are not allowed to exceed Mach 1 over the United States, with limited exceptions. NASA reports that between 1956 and 1968, 38, 831 claims against the Air Force were made to cover losses from sonic booms, ranging from broken glass and cracked plaster to claims of pets dying.
Unless you own a fighter jet, you don’t need to worry about breaking this FAR.
What is the flight’s average speed?
The typical cruising speed of a commercial aircraft is between 880 and 926 kilometers per hour, equivalent to 475 to 500 knots or 547 to 575 miles per hour. Long-distance flights necessitate a higher speed to maintain optimal efficiency.
How fast is a fly in KM?
Dragonflies are the fastest flying insects, with a top speed of 56 km/h (35 mph). They are capable of maintaining a brisk walking pace of 7 km/h, which makes them difficult to catch. This perception of speed is likely due to the dragonfly’s acrobatic nature. To access further scientific information, please subscribe to BBC Focus magazine and follow @sciencefocusQA on Twitter.
Do planes have a speed limit?
Aircraft vary in speed during flight due to sky speed limits, with all aircraft below 10, 000 feet requiring a slow down of 250 knots or less. Near busy airports, they must slow down to 200 knots or less. Pilots set flight profiles for efficient climbing, cruising, and descent settings. Prioritizing safe altitudes is crucial for emergency situations and power loss. Keeping aircraft at the optimal speed is essential for efficient flight operations.
Can a plane fly for 10 hours?
Long haul flights are a common experience for travelers, with flights lasting over 6 hours or longer than 10 hours. To make long haul flights more enjoyable, it is essential to keep your seatbelt fastened at all times in case of unexpected turbulence. This can lead to severe neck or head damage if the plane hits the ceiling. Airlines often keep seatbelts fastened during flights, which is a common practice among staff.
When choosing an airline for long haul flights, it is important to consider the In-Flight Entertainment (IFE) system. Asian airlines, including the Middle East, offer better IFE systems, with Emirates being a favorite due to their extensive ICE system, which can cover over 4000 channels. Other Asian airlines with strong IFEs include Qatar, Etihad, Singapore, and Cathay Pacific. Additionally, better airlines offer more frequent food offerings, reducing the likelihood of hunger.
In summary, long haul flights can be tiring but can be made more enjoyable by choosing the right airline and ensuring a comfortable and enjoyable experience.
📹 How Fast Do Planes Fly? During Takeoff, Flight and Landing
How Fast Do Planes Fly? During Takeoff, Flight and Landing. Airplanes are designed to let air pass around them with less drag.
Short Answer: No, the movement of airplanes is not affected by the earth’s rotation, due to the fact that earth’s atmosphere rotates with the planet. Meaning that any object within the atmosphere of Earth would not move in any other way that is dependent on the earth’s rotation. This is why objects in space move in different ways in relationship to earth, whereas objects within the atmosphere of the earth move with the earth, and are unaffected by our planets rotation, or revolution around the sun.
This is such bs. How are you going to say that a 747 generating 1008 kilo-Newtons of force in the air for 7 hours isn’t counter acting the spin of the Earth at all ( 2:24 ). So please explain how many kN would you need to actually leave the inertial frame of the earths rotation? If you say it’s impossible again, then the Earth is flat and stationary.
The simple answer to the question is aircrafts are much much smaller in comparison to the earth itself, therefore the gravitational field of earth is responsible for this effect. In other words everything present in this world is glued to the surface due to its gravitational pull and we rotate along with the earth without noticing any angular acceleration caused by the rotation of the earth.
Theres more to this topic. Flying westward 1600kph at the equator eliminates the centripetal momentum, therefore objects will weigh marginally heavier. But if eastward, it will be marginally lighter, and so the same propelling force allows objects of the same mass travelling east, to fly marginally quicker and higher. And higher further reduces the gravitational pull by another tiny margin. At altitude where air mass is so thin, aircrafts can and must travel quicker to generate enough lift against its weight (not mass).
I think we all need to remember: The earth is rotating at 1600 kilometers per hour, 1-And the air nearest the ground is also traveling that speed. 2- also you and I and the parked airplane are also traveling at the same speed while we are “standing still” on the earth. But yes this article has my mind doing a lot of thinking.
Moving air, water is deflected to the right in the Northern Hemisphere by the Coriolis effect, left in SH. These effects are large over big distances. But the effect would be the same whether you’re flying east or west. Except-if you’re headed East, you’re deflected in the direction of a faster spinning planet-in the NH.
if you jump up you will land west from the point you jump due to Coriolis effect. There is a Coriolis effect. if you jump 20cm then the effect will be only few micrometers. But if you throw a ball to a height of 20m then the effect will be few millimeters. And if you shoot a bullet to a height of 1km than the effect will be approximately few decimeters up to 1 m.
So what stops the earth turning under the planes? Why does he say it doesn’t matter if you’re flying east or west you go at the same speed then says you go faster east cuz of the earth turning? So the earth pulls everything along with it except for air? How come even from the moon or from Mars you can’t see he earth turn? If when you jump in the air you’d wind up hundreds of meters away if it wasn’t for gravity so why can’t you see that rotation from space? If you had a steel ball spinning in a circle and had magnets attached to it and you flicked the magnets up in the air off the ball they’d come back down to the ball but not in the same spot they left from so how does gravity work differently. How can you have people on the top, sides, and bottom of a ball obviously standing upside down compared to each other but they all think they’re standing upright on top of it? How does gravity change your perception of standing upside down on the bottom of the ball? Why can’t we replicate this effect of things sticking to the ball even though it’s spinning? Things fly off a spinning ball. How does the ocean water curve curve upwards to form a ball? Water always flows to the lowest point so how does it also hump up in the air forming a ball? If gravity is constantly pulling everything towards the center of the earth why isn’t all the water underground? How does water flow upwards in rivers when they’re on the side of the ball as it’s rotating? Why does water flow downhill off mountains but then stop when it gets to a certain height and not continue it’s downward path underground?
No it doesn’t. A plane moves with the wind and the wind moves with the Earth. What speeds up the plane is the direction and speed of the wind. Tailwinds speed up a plane’s speed over the ground. A headwind slows it down. It’s the same physics as a boat driving through a river upstream, downstream, or crosstream however you sailors call it.
The air and the ground moving with and rotating with the Earth. When a plane is either on the ground or the air over that spot on the ground, it is moving at the same speed as Earth rotation. Like a car, if you add propulsion you will begin to move over the ground at a given speed, the same applies to an aircraft in the air, it moves thru the air and over the ground at a given speed. Now add a tail wind speed or subtract head wind speed from the ground speed and that dictates how long it will take the aircraft to arrive somewhere.
Looking at the comments here, it seems that by mentioning Newton and not mentioning Einstein, you’ve confused the issue. Let me say in one sentence what you took 3:15 to say, but never actually said. The answer to to whether the Earth’s rotation affects the the airplane’s speed or flight time is ‘NO’ because the plane’s movement is relative to the Earth’s movement, whether that be the Earth’s spin (approx. 1,670km/h or 1,000mp/h or its orbit around the sun (approx. 107,000km/h or 67,000mp/h).
Earth rotates on its access, orbits the sun, sun orbits black hole of Milky Way, galaxy shooting through the universe, four different motions in four different directions at ridiculous speeds each one, and yet? We’ve seen the same stars/constellations in the firmament for Eons, they all rotate pivoting on Polaris in ONE circular motion, NOT FOUR… how’s this posible Neal? Anyone?
I agree with AI, from ChatGPT: In theory if I could jump and stay in the air for 10 hours, due to earth rotation, will I land in the same spot after 10 hours? No, if you were able to stay in the air for 10 hours, you would not land in the same spot due to the rotation of the Earth. This is because while you were in the air, the Earth would continue to rotate underneath you, so when you landed, you would not be in the same place where you jumped. The Earth rotates at a speed of approximately 1,000 miles per hour (1,600 kilometers per hour) at the equator. Therefore, after 10 hours, the Earth would have rotated by 10,000 miles (16,000 kilometers) at the equator. If you were able to jump high enough to stay in the air for 10 hours, you would still be moving with the rotation of the Earth, so you would land in a different spot than where you started.
I think it all comes to gravity. As long as something is affected by gravity it will basically stay anchored to that point even in the air; this is just a hypothesis of course but I think about helicopters that can hover over the same spot for hours if they need to and the earth doesn’t fly pass it ; even with winds it will stay relative to the point is hovering over . So I think anything under our atmosphere will stay in the same motion relative to the earth until we escape earth’s gravity in space and then we can see the earth move under us.
Wait a minute, at the equator the earth rotates at 1600km/ph take off speed of jetliners range from 240-280km/ph now, if we built airports at the equator, does it mean all jetliners will take off at the same speed the earth rotates at, if the earth rotates with everything on it at the same speed? The same question when it comes to landing, how much runway would be required at the equator for a plane landing at equivalent speed with the earth rotation? What would be the breaking intensity applied to stop that object?
Gravity has an influence on the weight of the airplane. Therefore the “rotation” around the earth reduces weight going east, with the earth rotation, and increase weight going west, against earth rotation. Centrifugal force is this factor. Weight, influences fuel consumption but not flight time. At the equator the earth rotation is 1666,6 kmh (40.000/24) IF a plane’s speed is 1666,6 kmh this dubbels the force east or “nulls” this force going west. v^2/r= (462m/s)^2/6300000m=0,034 Newton Therefore simplified, weight is increased by this N amount going west and decreased by this N amount going east. Difference is thus 0,068 N 1 G is 9,8 N = thus 0,068 N is aprox 0,7% of the weight. If this aircraft weights 100.000 kg its a difference of 700 kg at a speed of 1666,6 kmh at the equator. Since a regular plane’s speed is 850 kmh and not 1666 kmh this effect is much smaller but for the Condorde this effect was greater. Concorde at Mach 2 the effect was aprox. 2 % thus 2000 kg in weight and therefore important in fuel consumption. For a regular plane it’s aprox. 0,01% and therefore not relevant messurable in full consumption.
Most of you fools here know the truth but choose to believe in lies. At what height, does the “air” stop spinning with the earth ?? If that is true, then a plane should be able to fly up to that point and just wait it out ! Are planes adjusting their altitudes every 2 minutes in order to avoid flying off the earth ?? They dont. why would that be ????
To put it simply, an airplane always flies with a speed relative to the air, for that there are the pitots. the ground speed is calculated by the navigation and gyroscopic system. it is the one indicated on the screens in the cabin. I remember passengers complaining that the plane was too slow but we had a very strong headwind but the plane was flying at cruising speed. a stewardess came to the cockpit and asked the captain to explain this to the passengers. of course the flight time was greatly increased compared to normal. on the other hand, on the return with a very strong tailwind, the flight time was greatly reduced compared to normal.
There is a subtlety however. Eastward flying planes are actually lighter due to the earth’s rotation and westward flying planes are heavier (and everything in them). This is because they are actually suborbitally flying. The westward flying plane gets heavier (at the equator) up to about 1000 mph where it then starts to get lighter again (due to the earth’s rotation). The eastward flying plane gets lighter the faster it goes. If the eastward flying plane could go 17,500 mph, it would actually weigh nothing!
We are moving along the atmosphere….atmosphere moving along the earth …glued together… one very interesting fact…we never touch a point again in space though the earth is rotating ….it is the same as falling from a cliff you will never re-visit a point that you have just passed…earth rotates around the sun which is also rotating in a bigger orbit so in a sense we are rotating and also moving forward in a spiral path
Lol besides all the other problems with your article, I will just correct you on two points ? 1. You are claiming the conservation of Angular Momentum ? This requires the object ( Airplane ✈️ ) to be Physically Attached to the rotating body, the object ( Airplane ✈️ ) cannot have left the surface of the rotating body and still conserve the body’s angular momentum, debunking your premise completely. Oh and in your article you tried to convolute between the conservation of linear and angular momentum, this is fraudulent the two cannot be compared…. 2. Newtons laws of motion were debunked by Quantum Mechanics, but it doesn’t really matter as his laws of motion are based on an Inertial Frame of Reference, you are detailing a Non-Inertial Frame of Reference so his laws do not and can not apply….
“it does not matter wheteher an airplane is moving westward or eastward, it is always moving at the same speed, TO THE EARTH” okay my question is this, if the speed we maintain when flying a plane is always similar, when compared to the GROUND, doesn’t that suggest airplanes moving eastward with the earth are needed to exert a lot more force to not only keep up with the earth’s rotation, but surpass it at the same relative speed of an airplane going the opposite direction? I researched, and planes move at about ~800 km/h. meaning half of the earth’s rotation speed. for the speed to be maintained (relative to the earth) when flying eastward, shouldn’t the plane exert 3 times its engine force? also, in the article he mentioned jetstreams, saying “moving in the direction of winds saves fuel and time” which confused me even more. the atmosphere always rotates with the earth and it moves at about the same speed. so moving “in the direction of the wind” is always moving eastward, with earth’s rotation. does that mean the wind is powerful enough to “carry” the airplane with it, so that we actually need to exert LESS force to fly at the same relative speed to the earth (when moving eastward that is)? please, I’m losing my mind over these questions. if anyone knows the answers I’ll be eternally grateful
If the atmosphere rotates along with the Earth how can a balloon move with respect to ground? The other flaw of the argument is that a plane moves with respect to the atmosphere not the ground. And there’s a third problem with it: an airplane has an internal engine that makes everything different so as to “jump and wait”. I am still not convinced yet…
the confusing part is that even THIN AIR AT THE TOP is moving with the same force and speed??? the higher up you go, to the extremes, is where I am still puzzled and looking for answers. I guess that it makes sense that (a better example would be a paper air plane throw inside a train… which is just a mind boggling reminder that we are in space moving at crazy speeds, yet we think of it as EARTH moving at that speeds but its us too
Your statement is not accurate. You make the assuption that the molecules of the atmosphere behave like a iron rod pinned in the ground. That assumption causes two issues: Firstly, the air masses above the equator will travel at 1600Km/h and the air masses above Europe (around 45 degrees North) will travel at half speed (around 800 Km/h), in order both of them to accomplish a rotation at 24h on different earth circles. This speed differential of the aerial masses should be causes trementous turmoil (the earth atmosphere would be like Jupiter), but it’s not happening on the real world. Secondly, you can’t expect that as the altitude increases the molecules of the atmosphere will behave again like a solid object. Due to friction the lower layers will follow the surface linear speed but the high layers couldn’t keep the same speed (actually due to increased radious from the center of the earth those molecules should have a bigger linear speed to remain aligned to surface below them). It’s far more complicated issue and needs more explanation.
It takes about 4 hours to fly from LA to Atlanta, it’s about 2,000 miles and flight speed is around 500mph. The earth is rotating away from the direction of flight at 700 mph, so according to this article, we had a tail wind of 700 mph, which is rediculous. Did we have the same headwind flying from Atlanta to LAX? If so, the air speed would have been about 1200 mph to make the flight in 4 hours but the Boeing 747 has a max speed of 544mph, afterwhich th plane can become unstable. Just using some basic math, none of this makes sense.
Yes planes moving in similar conditions away from each other shouldn’t matter to speed in the air… so would be same speed but… but surely travling towards something that’s moving away takes longer… and travling away from somewhere going to a place that’s moving towards you would be shorter… or isn’t this in dispute?
Let’s not forget that jumping or a ball or a bullet or any object is already being acted on by the rotation at the moment of release, so it only make sense that it wall fall back almost exactly near that point, if somehow you could cease the rotation for a moment then release the object then restart motion the object would indeed fall to a new location, mathematically it’s conceivable and proven to exists the opposing directions do have time over distance differences…
So if I understood this correctly, an aircraft flying west cancels out some of the the rotation speed of the earth with its engines, thus letting the earth move eastward underneath at a faster speed until it reaches its destination? Whereas an aircraft travelling East ADDS to the rotational speed to reach its destination. I never thought of it this way 🤔
Assume earth is a ball imagine we have infinite numbers of needles they are peirced in on every possible point of the surface of the ball. Think that each such niddle is basically represent gravitational force. In this case all objects fall under these needles are technically pierced by it as well. Now assume ball is rotating in this case along with needle all objects glued to it also rotate in same speed. If airoplane wants travel then it require some force to break the glued needle and move forward to other needle. This way we still need to travel to other place with expense of time and energy to break out from such each infinite gravitational needles to reach the destination.
I but I do think if two planes take off at the same point at the same time traveling at the same speed, one heading west while the other heading east to a destination of equal distance, the plan heading west will arrive earlier that the one heading west. This is because the east destination is moving towards the plane while the west destination is moving away. Right?
Yup! The plane’s travel time is affected by the rotations of the Earth. When the plane move along the wirh the rotation of the Earth, it tàkes a bit longer to reach the destination. But if the plane travels opposite to the rotation direction of the Earth, the plane reaches the destination earlier compared with the first one. One more thing to consider is, when the plane’s altitude is higher than usual, the plane should travel faster to reach the destination on time.
hey, article creator. I’ve to say, as a human being, that I’m highly embarrassed by the amount of highly uneducated people you managed to amass in this comment section. never before have I witnessed something like this. I’m beyond words. would that be an actual representation of mankind, we’d all be doomed.
1 There is no earth rotation Supposedly the earth rotates 1 time a day around its own axis. That would be 40000 km in 24 hours at the equator. Or 1666.66 km per hour. Or 465.3 meters per second. One should be able to measure see hear or feel that. The simplest proof that the earth is a rotating ball would be a genuine uncut article from 20 to 70 km height, on which we see the earth, how it rotates at the equator with 1.35 times the speed of sound = 1670 km per hour. Up to now this is missing. Instead one wants to measure and/or prove the earth rotation with any weak-minded things. Pendulum, red shift, parallax and other fake things. At the same time the earth is supposed to rotate around the sun with the hypersonic speed of 108.000 km/h (30 km per second). The rotating spherical earth is also supposed to rotate around the Milky Way together with the sun with the hypersonic speed of 800,000 km/h (eight hundred thousand km per hour). 800.000 km per hour are 222 km per second. That would be nearly 650 times faster than the speed of sound. In addition the rotating earth together with the sun and the Milky Way should circle at the same time with the hypersonic speed of nearly 2.000.000 km/h (2 million km/h) around the galaxy. That is 555 km per second or almost 1,620 times faster than the speed of sound. All of this is supposed to happen simultaneously. At different speeds. In different directions. Nobody ever has noticed some of these crazy speeds. And in the evening we see the same stars year after year.
Because of gravitational effects, this explanation is correct. But, the farther you are away from the surface of the earths’ surface, gravity will have less of an effect and an object will be able move quite independently with respect to the earth’s surface. Hence, satellite orbits around the poles and geostationary around the equator.
Exactly on the North Pole and South Pole there has to be no rotation, and if you lived there on that spot there is no Time Zone, there you don’t need a clock, nor watch. The only disadvantage is that you wouldn’t know when your birthday is. There the time stands still, and you would live for ever. That’s why the authorities hide from people where exactly the North Pole and the South Pole are, fearing a hyper population that would unbalance the earth’s yearly trip around the sun, causing a deviation that would toss us all into a black hole of dark matter, where we all would met the Bosom of Higgs for the first and the last time. The End
If anyone truly believes this then I pray you get help! Like the guy commented below, this article shows the earth is spinning, so the land is moving as well. So why not just lift up in the air with a helicopter in Georgia and wait for California to “spin” toward you and land? Do any golfers take into consideration the spin while hitting a golf ball from the tee box? If the earth is moving as the article states while describing how planes fly, then it says if you jump straight up in the air, you are not effected and land in the same place, does it not apply to humans/why does the earth not move? I was at a birthday party and a kid accidentally lost grip on their balloon (filled with helium) and it drifted up in the air and actually drifted west. Why didnt it go east with the flow of the earth? Speaking of kids, remember as a child when we first road a small 4 seater merry go round at the park and once the adult spun you around fast, you could see the person across from you but try to view that adult who spun you fast and you’d almost break your neck looking back & forth, same thing on the Gravitron ride at the carnival. Yet we are supposedly spinning up to 1000 mph circling the sun at over 66000 mph while chasing/spiraling after the sun through the universe at even faster speeds, yet I can lay on my back outside on the ground close my eyes and remain still & quiet and not feel a bit of motion. I can walk outside at night and see with my own eyes the stars moving in a circular motion.
1 Bring me a real uncut article (no fisheye lens) from 20 to 70 km above ground where we can see the earth rotating at the equator with 1.35 supersonic speed = 1666 kmh. If you couldn’t show a rotation as quick as a fighter jet or a 9mm machine pistol bullet – the spinning ball earth does not exist. And Please …. Show evidence that the rotating ball earth rotates simultaneously around the sun with the hypersonic speed of 108.000 km/h (one hundred and eight thousand km per hour). This is 30 km per second or nearly 65 times as quick as a 9 mm machinepistol bullet. And please… Show simultaneously around the milky way with the hypersonic speed of nearly 800.000 km/h (eight hundred thousand km per hour). This is 222 km per second or nearly 480 times as quick as a fighter jet. And please… Show evidence that the rotating ball earth rotates together with the sun simultaneously around the milky way with the hypersonic speed of nearly 800.000 km/h (eight hundred thousand km per hour). This is 555 km per second or nearly 1.200 times as quick as a fighter jet.equator. If you couldn’t show a rotation as quick as a fighter jet or a 9mm machine pistol bullet – the spinning ball earth does not exist.
I’d say before continuing the article, I don’t think so. Gravity is still in effect. Think of it like a string attached to the plane from the center of earth. The only thing that’ll speed it up is if has more turbines 😂. Other than that, it will still fly the same speed as to what it is capable of. Gravity is still present as the plane flies. The only thing that keeps it afloat is the planes ability to sail the winds. Never really thought about it till the question arose. I always have thought (or at least assumed lol) the plane goes faster when you fly opposite to the earths rotation. But upon introspection, it really doesn’t. Just ended the article. Ha!!!! I was correct!!!
An airplane would retain its speed in vacuum, but here on earth, it is obviously not the case, the plane would have to struggle against a headwind of 1,600 km per hour, if traveling East to West, and if traveling West to East it would have the help of a tailwind of 1600 km per hour. Traveling North or South there would be a lateral wind coming from West of 1600 km per hour, making it impossible to maintain the plane on a North-or South bound direction. The End. Note: No plane can fly against a wind with a supersonic speed of 1,600 km /h Second Note: Speed of Sound: 1,235 km/h. Third Note: Cruising speed of a comercial jetliner: 800 km/h. Against a 1600 km/ h Wind at a cruising speed of 800 km/h the plane would have a negative speed of 800 km/h, meaning that the plane would be pushed backwards at a speed of 800 km/h. 😂😂😂 Don’t ever forget: We are NOT in a VACUUM.
I can prove you are wrong ….yes the rotation of the earth not change the airplane speed but if you flight the opposite direction of the earth rotation you will get to your destination faster I did travel from california to Vietnam took 18 hours and when I come back from Vietnam to california took only 16 hours
But asap the plane takes off it is not connected to the ground system and its velocity should reduce by time until straight downward only. The air and the ground are not connected in the molecular plane that means they are 2 seperate system therefore asap the airplane disconnects from the ground also its velocity should not be affected by its speed
This is interesting and understandable. However, if this were true in all cases, how can we explain this?—> for long-range rifle precision shooting, there seems to be a repeatable and calculatable difference if the gun is pointed North / South / East or West. The bullet path is not common to each of these 4 compass directions. Coriolis effect…..one example here—> youtube.com/watch?v=ouOYAlcvwOQ
Listen to how stupid this is. So at the equator the earth and the atmosphere moves east at 1000mph so a plane moving west is flying thru 1000 mph wind… imagine throwing a football westward, it could kill someone if this was true. They are liars and it is a very simple, just THINK. There is no valid reason why this atmosphere would travel the same rate? Gravity? Not according to the formula we use to calculate the “force” of gravity. Actually the force of the vacuum outstrips gravity by 10³⁰ calculated on 02 at 5ft above earth surface (which gives gravity significant advantage, but still failed spectacularly). Plus you can’t have a pressured system unless it’s enclosed (a can of soda could never be pressurized without being sealed).
The earth rotation speed is different on the globe 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 The circumference of the earth varies depending on the latitude buth the earth as a “globe” is rotating as a unit!!!!!! Regardless of what latitude I am at. Otherwise I would move faster in the time on a globe the further south or north of the equator I am than you, who are exactly at the height of the equator. At least according to your explanation!!!
If I hover stationary above the ground for 12 hours, the other side of the earth should then be beneath me and the fact that it isnt, the fact that the same area is still beneath me, proves our world is flat and stationary and its the vast holographic dome above us, projecting blue sky days and animated star nights is whats actually revolving, a faith shattering revelation.
Before listening to the article I`d say that the rotation of the earth doesn`t affect the speed of an aircraft in flight above it. I`ve flown, for example, between London and New York City and from New York City to London. At these lines of lattitude ( given that NYC is a little further south than London ) the earth rotates at approximately 500 mph from east to west – conveniently close to most passenger aircraft at altitude. Does it not follow that in flying from New York to London at 500mph I`d never get there, since the globe below my plane is rotating at the same speed, west to east ? It would make no sense for the world that spins to affect ( `affect`seems strange to me, since `affect` I understand to mean a term in Psychiatry, so I`lll use `effect ). It would make no sense for the world that spins to effect the speed ( Distance, / time ). Take a fixed point x on the surface of the earth and a point y 100km directly above the earth at x. In 24 hours they are still at the same point on the surface of the earth and at the same point above the earth, yet y has travelled a much larger distance then x – in the same amount of time. Ah, to hell with it. I have no idea.
Come ooon just admit it …earth is not likeyou describe it !! Just put on flat earth, and you don t have to give a new lie each time a shocking question to you appears. Sometimes i wonder how did they convince bilions of people that earth is round and spining on it self and bla bla blaaa… the funny thing is, those people act like they have knowledge😋