The Indian Supreme Court has ordered a temporary ban on tourism in the core areas of 41 state-run tiger reserves due to the decreasing number of tigers in the country. The ban, which has been extended until September, is seen as a baseless claim by conservationists and tour operators who argue that wildlife tourism should be better managed. However, they resist calling for a ban, stating that it would be a disaster.
The Supreme Court’s decision raises fundamental questions about the impact of tourism on tigers and the communities living within them. Proponents argue that tiger tourism is intrusive and disturbs the natural habitats of tigers and other wildlife. The Comprehensive Guidelines on Strategy, Tiger Conservation and Tourism in and around Tiger Reserves envisaged that 20% of the core reserve area be protected.
The Supreme Court has also ordered an embargo on tourism in the core zones of India’s government-run tiger reserves to aid conservation efforts. However, some conservationists argue that banning tourism won’t save the tiger in India, but may hasten its extinction. The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 implies that tourism to all “core” tiger habitats in India should be banned.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision to temporarily ban tourism in the core areas of tiger reserves raises significant questions about the potential harm to the tourism industry and the tiger population.
📹 Climate Change Debate | Kriti Joshi | Opposition
The Motion: This House Believes The West Has No Right to Impose Environmental Standards on Developing Countries Kriti Joshi …
What are the problems with wildlife tourism in India?
Climate change and natural disasters are destroying wildlife habitats and ecosystems in India, impacting wildlife tourism infrastructure and visitor experiences. Wildlife tourism involves traveling to areas rich in flora and fauna, observing species in their natural habitats through various tours, nature walks, trekking, bird sighting expeditions, and safaris. India is a popular destination for wildlife enthusiasts due to its diversity, geographical location, picturesque landscapes, and biodiversity.
Major threats to wildlife include illegal wildlife trade, habitat destruction, human-animal conflicts, poaching, pollution, and climate change. Wildlife tourism in India promotes tourism, generates revenue, and promotes conservation, sustainable practices, and biodiversity awareness.
What are the problems with tiger conservation in India?
Tiger populations in India face threats such as habitat loss, fragmentation, poaching for illegal wildlife trade, and human-wildlife conflict. Rapid deforestation, urbanization, and human encroachment are reducing tiger habitats, limiting their ability to find prey and mates. Tigers are also targeted for their body parts, which are highly valued in illegal markets for traditional medicine and luxury goods. Poaching reduces food availability, causing malnutrition and weakening tiger populations.
Human-wildlife conflict arises from tigers preying on livestock near human settlements, leading to retaliatory killings by villagers. Inadequate management of protected areas makes tiger reserves vulnerable to poaching and illegal activities. Climate change, such as increasing temperatures and altered rainfall patterns, degrades tiger habitats, affecting prey availability, water sources, and habitat suitability.
Conservation efforts in India include initiatives like Project Tiger and the All India Tiger Estimation, which focus on habitat preservation, anti-poaching activities, community involvement, and international cooperation to protect and increase the tiger population.
Why do tigers need to be saved?
Tigers hold significant cultural value globally, nationally, and locally, and are crucial for Indigenous Peoples and local communities living near or in tiger habitats, as preserving tigers can also preserve traditional cultures.
What are the benefits of tiger reserves in India?
Tiger conservation offers numerous economic benefits for communities, including protecting fish nurseries, agricultural lands, clean drinking, and irrigation water. However, threats to tigers include illegal wildlife trade, poaching, and increasing human-tiger conflict. WWF India has been working on tiger conservation for over three decades, starting with the ‘Project Tiger’ in 1971. In the 1990s, a focused Tiger Conservation Programme (TCP) was initiated to stabilize the declining population in India.
The TCP aims to protect tigers by maintaining and restoring tiger habitats and critical wildlife corridors. WWF India’s efforts have been instrumental in creating a safer haven for tigers, despite the threats they face.
Are tigers a problem in India?
Due to the lack of large national parks, tiger preserves, or sanctuary spaces in India, individual wildlife like tigers and elephants may stray out, becoming troublesome and potentially dangerous.
What is India doing for the tigers?
The Indian government has launched Project Tiger, a comprehensive conservation program since 1973, aiming to protect tiger habitats and reduce threats to their survival. The program has helped increase the tiger population in India by over 500. Other initiatives include establishing more tiger reserves, collaborating with NGOs and conservation organizations, increasing funding for tiger conservation, working with local communities to reduce human-tiger conflict, and cracking down on illegal wildlife trade. Protected tiger reserves and national parks, such as Jim Corbett National Park and Bandhavgarh National Park, have provided essential sanctuaries for tigers.
What is the need for tiger conservation in India?
Tiger conservation is crucial as it leads to the conservation of other species like ungulates and pollinators. Tigers are listed as endangered in the IUCN red list, highlighting their importance in wildlife conservation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of tigers?
Tigers, despite their heavy build, have remarkable suppleness of movement due to their sensitive feet and soft pads. This makes them incapable of crossing country or walking over broken or thorny ground, and they must be aware of baking hot ground to avoid blisters. Their strength is limited to two springs, and they can eat up to 20% of their weight in a single meal.
Tigers’ solitary lifestyle has disadvantages, including not being able to profit from group hunting like lions and not relying on others for food during recovery. In Asia, there is an active trade of materials made from tigers, with bone selling for $3250 per kilogram in Taiwan, and skins costing up to $10, 000. Tiger parts are also sold for their medicinal and spiritual value, with medicines made from tiger brain believed to cure acne and whiskers acting as a charm for protection and courage.
What is a major problem of India’s travel and tourism industry?
The Indian tourism industry faces several challenges, including insufficient digital promotion and marketing, high taxes on airline facilities, hotels, and tour operators, increasing security issues like sexual abuse of women, theft, and credit card fraud, and public violence. To address these issues, a National Tourism Authority (NTA) should be established to execute and operationalize various tourism-related initiatives, while a National Tourism Advisory Board (NTAB) should provide overall vision, guidance, and direction for the development of the tourism sector.
Creating synergy in the tourism eco system is crucial for ensuring synergy at various levels of government and with the private sector. A robust framework for quality certification of products and services across all segments should be laid down. Enhancing existing luxury tourism products, such as Nilgiri Mountain Railway and Palace on Wheels, should be enhanced and their numbers should be increased. Railways can play a game changer by operating more trains connecting tourist destinations and providing an array of products, from luxury tourist trains to budget catering tourist trains.
Prioritizing popular tourist destinations is essential, and the Indian Government has taken several initiatives to promote tourism. The Swadesh Darshan Scheme, launched in 2014-15, encourages theme-based tourism and develops tourism-related infrastructure at over 500 tourist destinations. The National Integrated Database of Hospitality Industry (NIDHI) aims to use technology to empower businesses, and the E-tourist Visa initiative simplifies the process of obtaining a tourist visa for foreign nationals.
The Indian Government has also launched advertising campaigns, such as the Italy edition of Incredible India Reconnect 2022, the International Buddhist Conclave, the National Mission for Pilgrimage Rejuvenation and Spiritual Augmentation Drive (PRASAD) scheme, a multilingual tourist helpline, and the Dharamshala Declaration, which recognizes India’s potential in supporting global tourism and promoting domestic tourism.
In conclusion, the Indian tourism industry needs to address these challenges and work towards a more sustainable and efficient tourism sector. By implementing these initiatives, the Indian government can continue to capitalize on its rich cultural heritage and attract international tourists.
Why are tigers important to India?
Tigers hold significant importance in Indian culture as they symbolize magnificence, power, beauty, and fierceness. They are also associated with bravery and valor in Hindu mythology as the vehicle of Goddess Durga. The Indian tiger has an orange coat with broad black stripes, black ears, powerful forepaws, and a long banded tail. Its total length is between 2. 6 to 3 meters and weighs between 135-230 kgs. Tigers are found in various countries, including India, Nepal, China, Russia, Bhutan, Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Thailand, Sumatra (Indonesia), and Malaysia.
Eight sub-species of tiger existed in the past, with three extinct. The five surviving sub-species are the Indian Tiger, Indo-Chinese Tiger, Siberian Tiger, Sumatran Tiger, and South China Tiger. The population in Peninsular Malaysia has been given a separate sub species, Panthera tigris jacksoni.
What are the problems with eco tourism in India?
The challenges faced include inadequate infrastructure, lack of sanitation facilities, disposal of campsite sewage in rivers, contamination of wildlife, livestock, and drinking water sources, deforestation, disruption of ecological life systems, and various forms of pollution.
📹 Comment yes for more body language videos! #selfhelp #personaldevelopment #selfimprovement
She was speaking in the AC hall, and all of those who were clapping have ACs/heaters in their homes and they have more electricity consumption than any person from developing nations. Historically CO2 is emitted by developed nations, and now developed nations want to share the responsibility to cope up with climate change. India and other developing countries were not part of that historic emissions. Now questions arise. How many developed countries provide funds for renewable transitions? Why do developed nations have issues with India providing subsidies for solar panels? What is the per capita emission of India or any developing countries? why western or so called developed nations don’t want to change their lifestyle? why are they forcing developing nations to limit their growth?
I am sure the other 3.5K (majority) likers don’t have any problem with how she speaks, stands and delivers the speech. Only dumb people have concerns to these. You know there goes a saying “Empty vessels make the most noise”. It takes a lot to stand there and deliver a speech written by herself. Debate is the flow of information and bring about a positive change and whether it done through reading or memorizing, same thing. Also monotonic reading is a different case. She was interacting with the audience too. And she has a British accent because she lives there. Don’t criticize when you can’t be close enough to her. I think she really deserves a clap.
I was scrolling down thinking i will get some more knowledge nd see some discussion how can we attempt to sort out the climate issue, but what i m seeing is people are more concerned about her body language, her memory power instead of the issue even after hearing these many thought provoking points. U came here to judge her or for the knowledge
I am in class 10th a 15 year old boy and recently in my school a debate was organised and the topic was “privatisation of Defence will weaken the Indian Army” and me and my team got the favour of topic( preposition of the topic) I struggled quiet a bit to understand the topic but after thoroughly studying it, I finally understood it and won the debate and also won the best debater award.
There’s no denying pollution in India but a polite disagreement to her saying the sky is opaque because I personally have never seen that. Another thing is that developed nations have carelessly industrialized and emptied resources but developing nations are not that’s why they’re still developing. We’ve already chosen the environment friendly path. But I agree nothing is enough. But when I look forward to hear such debates in Oxford I am surprised to hear what I already know. People have heard the problem now they need a solution which I don’t see here. Still delivery of speech and all that was good. So congratulations 🇮🇳🙏🥰
India has shown the world, we are leading from the front, we have formed International Solar Alliance, we have given the world Panchamrit(by our PM in the latest COP26) we are the only developing country to fulfill the targets of Paris Climate Accords efficiently, we have given to ourselves ambitious targets… Moreover leave the historical emissions done by the West, our per capita emissions is still one of the lowest in the world… The developed nations never delivered on their promise to provide financial and technical assistance to developing nations(agreed upon in the Paris Climate Accord), we still don’t complain and we have still set an ambitious target of attaining net zero emissions.. except for few Polluted towns the sky in India is still blue and clear, as per the latest report our forest cover has increased, we have focused on electric vehicles inspite of our financial barriers… It’s easy to target your home country standing in the Oxford, the real challenge is to stand United and fight against the evil Climate Change and,… And her speech was just fantastic
I can relate to this girl. Last year when I gave my presentation at Institute, some said I gave mind-blowing facts and envied my speaking skills. While some criticized me saying I was using too much hand gestures and body language like I’m dancing. I ain’t minded them but I just think I can give a better knowledge with gestures and motions. It’s like we’re picturing something and bringing in front with gestures.
Delhi’s sky does not count as Indian sky my girl. The sky in my area is bright blue, sometimes cloudy, and at night, so full of stars. Come visit sometimes, you’ll see that India is not all pollution. Oh, soory, don’t! We’re better left ignored with untouched beauty, stay in the cities please. This doesn’t mean that climate change isn’t serious tho. Amazing delivery by the way. 💚
4:35 As Indian I never saw my sky is brown it’s beautiful pure seems untouched.The brown sky may be seen in Delhi and NCR, western U.P and some parts of the states near the Delhi. I am not favouring pollution but the Whole India isn’t polluted and I’m not waiting for it😄.Although we have to tackle the pollution in India where it is.
As an Indian, I want to say on behalf of all developing countries, we are just paying for what western developed countries did 200 years ago, it’s them that they are responsible for global warming, through the industrial revolution they have augmented the world’s economic in their country, now when developing countries are on wave to have industrial or manufacturing revolution, they are forced down to come down, no we will not step down untill you all western countries provide us sufficient funds and technology to help us . You all bear a responsiblilty to help.
Contribution of developing nations in climate changes we are facing today is very very less compared with that of developed nations. It’s nice thought that developing nation cannot do the same mistake already done by developed one’s. But you cannot just keep developing countries in the same list of climate change sinner, which I feel has been did by over exharation of problems in India.Indeed We need a sustainable way by which developing countries could grow without any contribution toward climate change. Kudos for her confidence and boldness.
If we see about the climate change or so much carbon in the air the major cause of these r the developed countries like UK…they did so much industrialization insted of thinking about the climate and becomes developed… while we r seeing the developing countries following the same path for being developed then we start caring about the climate change..🤷🏻♂️ but if we think the major cause of the climate change then these are the developed countries (not the developing countries ) which already produced enough carbon in the air…if the developed countries really cares about the climate change then they should provide enough technology and resources for the developing countries which they have so that developing countries can take control on the production of the carbon so the new generation takes the first step towards the healthy environment…Thank you 🙏🏻 lots of love from India❤️🇮🇳
She travels with bicycle wherever she goes and lives in Hut nearby a tree to avoid scorching heat of Indian summers and his clothes aren’t made up of animals skin or made in Any industry that empty there waste products into the rivers and she eats raw food because can’t cook without electricity,gas ., Lastly she is using paper made of waste products . She is just the flag bearer we needed to preserve our nature .
There is few factually incorrect things I would like to point out: 1. Venus is not at same distance as Earth if one end point is sun. 2. Indian Earth Not brown but blue. ( u literally never explored a city other then u reside in.) 3. Population boom is natural- Biological selection too. It needs no artificial temperature to be maintained like in West with Gas from RUS.
Lots of inaccuracies in her opening statement. Firstly, Venus is less than 70 million miles from the Sun and Earth is on average around 93 million miles from the Sun. Carbon, in Earth’s atmosphere is comprised of around 0.042% Carbon Dioxide whilst Venus comprises 95% Carbon Dioxide. Mercury doesn’t have an atmosphere so heat can’t ever be trapped on the planet so if there is nothing to heat, then it merely is the temperature of the Sun’s rays as they reach the planet surface, on Mercury. Mercury’s temperature varies a lot, it can be as hot 400 plus Celsius but also really cold on the surface facing away from the Sun. Because the planet rotates very slowly, it’s day is longer than it’s year so it’s average temperature is very reasonable when you average these out as a result of an extremely thin, almost nonexistent atmosphere. Also, the density of the atmosphere on Venus is 90 times that of the Earth. All these factors have a major impact on what can happen where. The Earth would struggle to get to 0.2% Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere, due to the volume of life which is carbon based, that is the reality regardless of how much carbon was ever released from the Earth. If all life was vapourised on Earth, what would happen, who can say. Humans cause more damage trying to fix things than letting nature take it’s course. They destroy perfectly balanced ecosystems and plant palm oil plantations for biofuels. We are cause and effect of all things wasteful and it is refuse which is the Greatest threat to our planet along with trying to save it.
Firstly, the best thing about the earth and the species on the earth is that they evolve. We are evolving with the changing climate. Although Climate change is a serious problem, nobody can deny the fact. Second thing is that earth would see another extinction of species like it had faced previously. That is inevitable we just can defer it for longer period.
Climate change is a natural occurring process that is clearly apparent in the studies of historical climate accounts. This, ofcourse, does not mean that our contribution to environmental pollution has not accelerated and exasperated this process. Let us, as a society, not be polarised in approaching such a challenge. Rather, let’s be united in achieving feasible strategies to counteract our own carbon footprints, individually and collectively.
Although this article is almost five years back, but I would like to add on into, that We agree that under our nation there is though to apply such policies which are mainly involved into environmental pollution, but as she said if could have find some solutions, awareness as well as government support so somehow we found control it over. And india is trying there best. Thank you 🙏
Where is the sky green in India.? Tell me. I live in Mumbai, financial capital of India, here also the sky is clear blue. May be in New delhi there is much pollution but even there the sky is not “green”. Madam Kriti . I can also say ok google and can take out stats but that dosnt mean the sky is green in whole India . Btw your reading skills were great, you read like Makhkhan.
👏🏽👏🏽great speech with tons of facts and reality .unfortunately the west always have double standards about their needs .The colonial countries still think that the rest of countries should yield to their own needs .Living in one such colonial country I find that the use of plastic has not reduced even vegetables are (eg cucumber)wrapped in plastic .People dry their clothes in electric driers even if the sun is shining .The west reliance of energy is far more per capita than the east yet they constantly try to put the onus on the developing countries to reduce their consumption of energy and water 🤔
Pollution is a huge world problem, but most of Europe, UK, Canada, Australia and NZ could stop 100% of all carbon footprint and it would be 3% of the world pollution. China and India are building 60 new coal fire plants every year. There regulations are nothing compared to the Western countries mentioned, yet the government’s in those countries are making the citizens pay huge taxes to insure they do these part on limiting world pollution. Like a tear drop in the sea.
These debates will hardly make a difference. At most people perusal this article will think these things 1. Wow these people have made it, they are pinnacle of human intelligence and sophistication. 2. Such an eloquent presentation. 3. I kind of envy them But how many will think the absurdity of this debate, the sheer hypocrisy? The resource consuming privileged lot should take a knee and let the actual guardians of the climate (The poorest of the world) speak. What is the point of vomiting information without any realization and change?
the agenda of climate change is a serious issue but developed nations are trying to do their monopoly. they do not want any developing country to outdrive them. being a global issue the climate change has lost its importance and now the steps taken by developed nations seems arbitrary to solve this issue. developing nations are trying to outdrive the developed nations and establish their power whereas developed nations don’t want to loose their hold and want to control and manipulate developing nations
all of the western nations(japan in asia) got industrialized in the early 20th century when no-one was keen to discuss on climate change even though industrialization was severely impacting environment….And now, if developing nations are getting industrialized, western nations are busy in delivering speeches on climate change…..If they were so worried about climate change, then why did they made themselves industrialized in the past??? Now if this western world wants to address this issue seriously, then they should work with developing nations in order to discover more sustainable ways for industrialization and not blame developing nations for opting for their own development…..
The point is not how good she speaks or well articulated her speech is. The point is “I am therefore I think” — Karl Marx. Being able to tackle climate change and preaching on it is easy when your stomach is full. The point is India has other many more critical problems at hand poverty, hunger, malnutrition, etc. The thing India is fighting for at global summits is Climate change a common but differentiated responsibility (CBDR). Developed nations are done with their critical problems so they can talk about climate change all they want because they are more prosperous. Controlling climate change is not free. It takes resources, money, technology which India is asking for. That is the debate. India is already ahead of its commitments on the Paris Deal. India and developing nations are aiming for global peaking of emissions. That should be the aim of advanced economies and provide developing nations with necessary resources and join the One World One Sun One Grid initiative of India.
Great speech! Some of the POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS INDIA is taking LEAD IN: 1)India is taking lead in bringing down its carbon footprint by promoting Solar energy, 2) India is looking for Biofuel as an option 3) India is increasingly working on producing green cement With so much going on, I believe we can overcome the danger of CLIMATE CHANGE with the right vision and action•
1.Our govt apply new bs 4 norms for vehicles 2. we are in top five country in solar power genration 3. We implement swach bharat that also reduce polluction 4.we are in top five in electrical vechiles 5.we are in 11 no in climatechange index 6.we are cleaning our revers 7.we are doing more plantations 8.our govt give more than 5 core gas connections in india In the end we r tring our best to protect our environment as a develping nation we r no 1 in world
I often here these kind of remarks that India is very polluted and it needs to do reforms on that to bring down its emission and its lacking behind many countries on the pollution level but clearly no one considers the per capita emission. USA stands 15% to China’s 28% whereas India emits 7% of the world’s accumulated carbon emission…..Now just consider the population factors and then see……..Do you still think India is the biggest polluter ????? USA has only 300 million in terms of population and it emits 15 %…..Dude at least curb something
4:03 How does the corrected quote still apply to her case? it’s the literal opposite? Her original point was that although India is far behind in emission rankings, the climate is pretty bad on ground level. And when she got corrected (India is actually far behind in making a change towards it) she casually went over it, pretending it fits her argument.
Thankfully it’s just a debate for the sake of debate, I agree with most of what she said except her preposition which is the very core of it. India bashing receives applause, it sells in the west, so she played to their prejudices, “I don’t have enough brown” said the kid. Madam, skies of Delhi are not the skies of entire India. Also she was factually incorrect at many places but to say that entire Bangladesh will submerge by the end of this century is laughable, her comment that developing countries contributed to climate change by ‘increasing their population’ is insensitive to say the least and idiotic at best. It’s pure rhetoric.
Well lots of data explained by this girl is already available on Google…I planted 3 days in my 23 years of life and I avoid to use plastic ….I am civil engineer and successfully used plastic in road(polyblend) in 2017 ….worked along with Sadhguru in kaveri calling and save soil mission …I hope she will take actual action rather than making money like others who we saw seated at various chairs in different conventions ….
Yeahhhhh, a prideful round of applause, Probably one the best ever address on the climate change crisis. But what would happen – Come on guys, let’s innovate world’s most amazing camera to get the live footage of countries like Bangladesh getting vanish from the earth and then to show our grief on YouTube, whatsapp, twitter, instagram. Haha.
I liked the way she delivered the content but I won’t call it a debate. It was more of a reading than a debate. I recently recorded myself presenting a country portfolio the same way she did while looking away from the camera and at the the screen while “readsenting” the content. My professor appreciated everything except for reading everything from the screen. Therefore, I got 17/20. Even though I knew my way of the presentation wasn’t correct, I had to do it for I was short of time due to my finals and couldn’t have enough time to memorize all the stuff I had to present about
Climate Change Debate/Summit/Meeting…… 1)Vacation for majority of world leaders(PMs or Presidents). 2)Part time job for some jobless men and women( like what you are perusal). . . . . . . .. 3)And Useless topic for us(Common people/students/working professionals). so don’t waste your time….and focus on your present. Thanks for reading…
To explain the high temperatur on Venus you must use Boyle’s Law PV/T = k => T = PV/k and you can see that the very high atmospheric pressure on Venus results in a very high temperature. It is not the high content of CO2 that causes the warming. Also Mars have 98% CO2 but temperatures below freezing because it has a very thin atmosphere (low pressure).
1. Be respectful 2. If you are interested to discuss about the topic, most welcome,if you aren’t please leave in peace. 3. Don’t use any bad or slang words. 4. Don’t ask anyone’s personal questions. 5. While the discussions going on if you want to say something, raise your hand the host will give you a chance to talk. And u are welcome anytime. Thank you ^^.
I’ll just leave it here If the whole world were to live like the Americans do, we would need 5 earths to sustain that lifestyle. And it would take almost 3 earths to have a lifestyle for the whole world, the kind of lifestyle that Europeans enjoy. And it would take 0.8 of today’s earth if whole world was living like India
i wish as an indian she would pointed out the practical problem and solution since so called these developed countries are outsourcing the products which is come out of polluted place (become polluted because of manufacturing and others) which i am not blaming them for,but u cant put blame on those shoulders for trying to gain prosperity as western countries did before instead think of solution for climate change to go hand with hand with their progress,i like her speech and pronounication /humour and all but for me she did not highlight anything new…since this is oxfords,i dont have expectation from this organisation except good vocabulary
madam with reference to the quantification of global pollution with Hiroshima Nuke blast you are giving out a false message to the public…the context in which the energy is getting trapped should be more clear…it is not just pollution which is contributing to the trapped energy…even though if there are no CO2 emissions or any particulate according to you that is responsible for trapping energy, the Earth will still heat up…this will happen due to the densities of built up of gases due to the increase in rate of diffusion at higher atmosphere…you should also have mentioned about the dissipation of trapped energy…energy is getting trapped leading to global temperature rise which everyone knows…but the rate of dissipation is also increasing…that is a scientific phenomenon called expansion of atmosphere…by expansion I do not mean the convective current…but strictly due to the phenomenon of diffusion to very detail which I cannot explain here…so do not completely blame on CO2 emissions for global temperature, because the mechanism is slightly different from the only typical notion of CO2 emissions leading to climate change…Thank You
The Good: 1. She has a flair of speech and confidence. Bad Points: 1.Could have done better. Reading through the paper? Referring for points is okay but reading out mostly from it. 2. The content was poorly researched. 3. Needs more voice modulation when pressing the main points. I have no idea why people are calling her speech amazing. I mean people’s emotion are understandable and we should appreciate and maybe be proud of her but to see debate as a whole she made generic and overlapping points compared to other speakers and was below par.
I think there might be japan origin as well as china but they speak English in their own accent when it comes to India humein America ka bhoot pachad deta hai…We cant be original because we feel the shame of the Indian accent…Legend like Abdul Kalam and Baba Saheb Ambedkar they had a full hold on english there words which they use even we cant understand until and less we open a dictionary….
See Venus suffered a runaway greenhouse effect dude to constant volcanic eruptions. Even with the worst prediction that is our average temperature rise by 2°C, waht happened on venus won’t happen on Earth. Studies have been conducted that the effect needs to be 100x worse for that to happen.(This is a recent study)
Surah no 17 ayat no 73 And indeed, they were about to tempt you away from that which We revealed to you in order to you invent about Us something else; and then they would have taken you as a friend Surah no 6 ayat no 121 : And do not eat of that upon which the name of Allah has not been mentioned, for indeed, it is grave disobedience. And indeed do the devils inspire their allies to dispute with you. And if you were to obey them, indeed, you would be associators Surah no 17 ayat no 110 Say, “Call upon Allah or call upon the Most Merciful (ar-Rahman). Whichever you call – to Him belong the best names.” And do not recite loudly in your prayer or quietly but seek between that an way Surah no 7 ayat no 156 And decree for us in this world good and in the Hereafter; indeed, we have turned back to You.” He said, “My punishment – I afflict with it whom I will, but My mercy encompasses all things.” So I will decree it for those who fear Me and give Zakah and those who believe in Our verses Surah no 7 ayat no 180 And to Allah belong the best names, so invoke Him by them. And leave those who practice deviation concerning His names. They will be recompensed for what they have been doing Surat No. 17 Ayat NO. 73 یہ لوگ آپ کو اس وحی سے جو ہم نے آپ پر اتاری ہے بہکانا چاہتے کہ آپ اس کے سوا کچھ اور ہی ہمارے نام سے گھڑ گھڑا لیں ، تب تو آپ کو یہ لوگ اپنا ولی دوست بنا لیتے ۔ Surat No. 6 Ayat NO. 121 اور ایسے جانوروں میں سے مت کھاؤ جن پر اللہ کا نام نہ لیا گیا ہو اور یہ کام نافرمانی کا ہے اور یقیناً شیاطین اپنے دوستوں کے دل میں ڈالتے ہیں تاکہ یہ تم سے جدال کریں اور اگر تم ان لوگوں کی اطاعت کرنے لگو تو یقیناً تم مشرک ہو جاؤ گے ۔ Surat No.